This implies that if there are bad actors/bad acts within intel community (as already confirmed by FISA court), we aren't supposed to want to expose or remedy them? It's kind of like saying you don't want to go after bad cops because it taints all cops. Not very logical, Captain.https://twitter.com/WalshFreedom/status/958170431961354241 …
-
-
Those are partisan opinions - not facts. As DOJ - Trumps DOJ - stated - publication without consulting intel and DOJ/FBI is beyond reckless. What misinfo from Wray (hand picked choice of Administration)? And minority memo? Last bastion of House bipartisanship now gone.
-
Nope, not partisan opinions. (Not everything you disagree with is a partisan opinion). It's only "reckless" when you listen to those defending their own. I gave you the link to Wray's proven misinformation.
-
Not everything you posit is truth. Could you resend link. Didn’t get it. Sorry to bother.
-
You are right of course. Here's the link:http://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/365131-fbi-chiefs-claim-on-surveillance-abuse-doesnt-fit-the-evidence …
-
I’ll admit a couple of things. Man, is that an unflattering of Wray. And excellent research on FISA issues - it’s quick partial reup recently by POTUS without much discussion concerned me greatly. But you wring a lot out of a general talking point. A bit too much to me.
-
Tweet unavailable
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Right. Both memos and cited evidence out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.