Instructive Wikipedia entry on FBI official at center of controversies--an example of controlled Wikipedia page/narrative (as I wrote of in The Smear/Stonewalled). Every characterization implies are no legitimate questions; it's all right wing conspiracy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Strzok …
-
-
“Losing” the 5 months of the text messages between Strzok and Page is ho-hum to Wikipedia.
-
My point is Wikipedia is not a source of reliable information. Anyone could load anything on it for nefarious purposes and a reader would not know. Wikipedia does not matter and Ya just can’t use Wikipedia as a source and remain credible. My ONLY point.
-
What is reliable?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can’t ever refer to Wikipedia when you have real sources to reference. Ever. Ever. Ever. You are BETTER than that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.