Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
SharylAttkisson's profile
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Verified account
@SharylAttkisson

Tweets

Sharyl AttkissonVerified account

@SharylAttkisson

Investigative Journalist @FullMeasureNews *Note* RTs not=endorsement; RTs may be interesting, silly, wrong, outrageous. Question authority. Think for yourself.

Washington, DC
SharylAttkisson.com
Joined October 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson 31 Dec 2017

    Sharyl Attkisson Retweeted Joe Albanese  🌊

    However, people who have provided me trusted info in past (including fmr. Obama admin. officials) have waved me off of the notion that there was Trump collusion and there hasn't yet been evidence of any that I have seen yet so much misreporting. So that's where I'm at.https://twitter.com/AlbaneseJoe/status/947491898800840705 …

    Sharyl Attkisson added,

    Joe Albanese  🌊 @AlbaneseJoe
    Replying to @SharylAttkisson
    What an absurd characterization of what happened. The investigation had to do with Russia’s active covert measures to meddle in our electoral process. 1) do you agree Russia did that? 2) if so do you not think this is worthy of investigation?
    7:49 AM - 31 Dec 2017
    • 62 Retweets
    • 170 Likes
    • Matt Rogge Karl Vincent Arizona Native vicki giangregorio Sally Walsh TherealQ Eric Greenbaum Diane Gore kibitzer
    25 replies 62 retweets 170 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Joe Albanese  🌊‏ @AlbaneseJoe 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        You mean Don Jr’s email exchange where he was told that the Russian gov’t wanted to help his fathers campaign and that they wanted to meet because they had dirt in Hillary isn’t evidence of collusion? Really? It may not be CONCLUSIVE evidence but it is evidence is it not!

        3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @AlbaneseJoe

        My trusted sources don't think that's 1. illegal 2. evidence of collusion (Collusion to do what?What do u think is illegal even if they *had* exchanged dirt?) We may not like it but there's a whole universe of oppo research. Dems spent more in '16 on it than Reps; both spent lots

        4 replies 6 retweets 10 likes
      4. Joe Albanese  🌊‏ @AlbaneseJoe 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        The email exchange is obviously not illegal in and of itself but if a foreign nation assisted with an in kind contribution to the Trump campaign by offering illegally obtained information on opponent that would be illegal.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/suspected-russian-spy-joseph-mifsud-visited-dc-in-2014-promising-to-dole-out-money-to-students/article/2639448 …

        2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @AlbaneseJoe

        Hmmm well if you see it that way it could be illegal on Russia's part but not President Trump from what I see. Secondly, there's a big assumption about the offer was for illegally obtained info. You may blow steam from your ears at this but those ex-Obama officials I trust don't

        1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes
      6. Joe Albanese  🌊‏ @AlbaneseJoe 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        Sharyl in all seriousness do you not think the fact that Flynn has struck a deal with Mueller suggests that he has something to offer? There are only a few bigger fish than Flynn - Don Jr, Kushner & of course Trump.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      7. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @AlbaneseJoe

        I have no inside info but if I had to bet I would guess Flynn is not offering anything that's actionable on Trump; I think he had no $ or appetite to see thru a court fight with DOJ. What do you think.

        4 replies 2 retweets 8 likes
      8. Joe Albanese  🌊‏ @AlbaneseJoe 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        I think Mueller won’t have given him such an incredibly generous deal unless he has something substantial to give them in return. I guess we will have to wait and see. It shouldn’t be too long though as I think the first 6 months in 2018 will give us a lot of answers

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      9. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @AlbaneseJoe

        Yes agreed. Also as to Flynn deal... either what you say is the case *or* they had nowhere else to go w/Flynn & got him on the lying because there was nothing else.

        1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
      10. 3 more replies
      1. Jprak  ❌  🇺🇸  🇮🇱  🇮🇳  ⭐  ⭐  ⭐‏ @sentient72 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        Even Obama green czar and noted CNN contributor Van Jones was caught on undercover video that the Russia collusion story was a Big Nothingburger....

        0 replies 4 retweets 7 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Alan Kleinman‏ @waggles111 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        It’s obvious that the people you are referring to don’t understand how an investigation like this works Everything is sealed and treated as classified information Anyone who thinks that Trump is going to be exonerated or that the indictments are over better spend the year sitting

        8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      3.  🇺🇸Casey Bartnik 🇺🇸‏ @Twitler_1984 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @waggles111 @SharylAttkisson

        pic.twitter.com/L1cSXyp89B

        0 replies 4 retweets 7 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. Gary R‏ @GaryDolphins 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        The collusion delusion.

        0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Erickson Marissa 👠‏ @Jwm55McKenzie 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        I’d like to know when the Russians didn’t try to subvert US Democracy. Nothing different in 2016.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      3. FiddyNap‏ @fiddy2nap 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @Jwm55McKenzie @SharylAttkisson

        pic.twitter.com/Ytz4Vqdvzf

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      4. End of conversation
      1. Peter‏ @PGOperations 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        Sharyl, are you making comments that are sensible, logical and posts (with info') that your comfortable to write online, how dare you, :D Happy New Year (coming) then again I was born in Australia, so it is :)

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Darrin‏ @longthaang1 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson

        This is absolutely rubbish. Obama admin sounded the alarms on possible collusion.I guess a DJT campaign official with foreknowledge of hacked emails and the operation to dump doesn’t count as collusion to a delusional person

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. CYD‏ @CYDharta 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @longthaang1 @SharylAttkisson

        What Trump campaign official supposedly had foreknowledge of hacked emails?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Darrin‏ @longthaang1 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @CYDharta @SharylAttkisson

        https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/12/30/politics/george-papadopoulos-russia-investigation-white-house-donald-trump/index.html …

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. CYD‏ @CYDharta 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @longthaang1 @SharylAttkisson

        Except there's no collusion in that article. If it's to be believed, which it isn't until at least Alexander Downer verify it, is says Papadopoulos knew about Russian emails, but not that anyone in the campaign approved of the dump.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      6. Darrin‏ @longthaang1 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @CYDharta @SharylAttkisson

        You must can’t read! The article spoke of a campaign official knowledge of hacked emails before they released. Where would he get this knowledge unless within the campaign.The same campaign official is cooperating witness.Try connecting the dots.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      7. CYD‏ @CYDharta 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @longthaang1 @SharylAttkisson

        I can read, although you can't write ("must can't"??). The article says he WAS TOLD. It doesn't say he had any kind of conversation. He's as likely to have heard it 17th hand thru the rumor mill as anything.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      8. Darrin‏ @longthaang1 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @CYDharta @SharylAttkisson

        So Mueller offers Papadopoulos a deal and becomes a cooperating witness after hearing about the hack through the rumor mill? HAHAHA! That’s funny.Still laughing. Let me guess...you probably don’t have good comprehension skills.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      9. CYD‏ @CYDharta 31 Dec 2017
        Replying to @longthaang1 @SharylAttkisson

        What's even more funny is the suggestion that Team Mueller actually has something. His office leaks like a sieve, but still nothing even approaching proof of collusion has leaked out.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      10. 2 more replies

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info