Sad to see respected journalists marching lockstep with the goals of the @GOP and @Foxnews to overthrow FBI to help @realDonaldTrump. Some saying the reason they "reported" is that others are reporting it, therefore it's news. It isn't, it's propaganda.
-
-
Sharyl, I didn't mention your name why would you think I was talking about you? Just curious. I like you and we have a good relationship so I don't get it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've been telling all I can how open you are and not slanted either way....then I see this piece on your show where a "liberal" (he was billed as such) talking about his "objective" take on Trump's body language, yet his take was subjective. He had no qualifications. Sad to see
-
...interesting to me and many viewers, though not everyone's cup of tea. But I seek a lot of different-unusual views. Here's a guy who opposes Trump, supports Sanders/Obama, but thinks that the media has been unfair to Trump. How can you not be intrigued?
-
After seeing the entire thread I"m not sure you were talking to me. It doesn't sound like me you're describing. I didn't say anything about media being unfair to Trump ever. And "The Media" (an all encompassing term) made Trump. How can they be unfair to him, report each word
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And yes you were on my mind when I wrote that tweet. I'm ashamed when I see good people doing bad things. I'm saddened that you put your energy into reporting poor reporter's reports; giving them more eyeballs for a story to overthrow our FBI. Dangerous stuff. I respect you but
-
I didn't report a poor reporter's reports; my story began with the Obama-appointed Dept of Justice Inspector General's investigation against various FBI and DOJ officials. Significant unless you're wearing blinders -- though I respect your opinion and disagreement.
-
Hi, what I read, not saw, on your site, was a column where what I heard, and I may be wrong, I'm not perfect, was "Hey...look...people are talking about all these people in the FBI etc leaving and under investigation". You didn't make a judgement but by posting kept story alive
-
Now I have to ask myself...why?
@Foxnews is attempting to discredit Mueller by accusing the FBI of "having opinions" (that's all that it is). But I expect more from you. I'm sorry. I am simply, temporarily, disenchanted. -
And in regard to the story about the "liberal professor" that "explains" Trump body language and how "the media" (whatever that means) has it all wrong could be summed up by saying "Hey, don't believe your eyes or 'them'". What media? Why him? It was a non-story
-
Lastly, and thank you...in regard to the FBI column (again I may be wrong) you can sum that up with "FBI agents have opinions. R/wing wants to manipulate this". Not a conspiracy guy but believe the r/wing using Orwellian double-speak to put fear in their lambs, create deep state
-
The r/wing cries "Deep state" but actually are trying to create one. The judicial appointments have been given to the Evangelicals to choose. They are putting in the worst of the worst in life long appointments. Or at least are trying... to support "religious" ideals. Thanks
-
Thought I was done but one last thing....if you are suggesting I think Trump gets bad play from Media just show me where? Thanks. If not then apologize. I also never said you were slanted, I said a reporter is helping the Trump cause of discrediting the FBI which is atrocious
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.