Based on your argument, one could also say: in 1967 there were negligible incidences of autism. Today, the CDC says it's 1 in 42 for boys. What changed? Vaccination. Do you agree with that statement? Or only your own?https://twitter.com/angryemu1/status/943673690310443008 …
-
-
Will take your word for it but I struggle to believe it. For example, did we even know what Asperger's Syndrome was 50 years ago, much less that it's part of the spectrum, much less how to diagnose it properly? I'd never even heard of it 20 years ago...
-
They used to call it idiot savant syndrome a century ago.
-
True. (But 1/42 boys wasn't thought of as an idiot savant.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s absurd to say diagnostic abilities have nothing to do with DIAGNOSING autism. Know what has increased greatly from 1967, specific to women? - birth control and psychotropic prescriptions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.