Agreed. But words from the President are not merely words, they often carry the weight of actions.
-
-
I've read most of the press on this, thanks. But a Q: why haven't you released said "evidence" or permitted the experts to speak on record?
-
I haven't stopped any experts but we filed suit 2.5 yrs ago and my attorney said esp with inaccurate press reporting to further their narratives it's best to stick with facts in court. But I have published some court docs on this...
-
That's fine, your entitled to your day in court. But, please, don't tell me I'm "uninformed" when you refuse to release the evidence
-
I don't think I've refused to release the evidence. For 2+ years anybody could see what we outlined in court docs, which is best way to discuss something that propagandists are trying to shape (I think).
-
Outlining in court docs is a narrative you've constructed. What about the 3rd party computer forensic reports? Or an independent review?
-
If you know how hard it is to sue the fed govt (with good reason) you might give our case the utmost credibility. We've survived all of their motions to dismiss.
#NotEasy -
Despite that difficulty, the existence of a civil case against the Federal Government does not necessarily equal a guilty Fed. Best of luck
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.