If Obama had said this, every single person who voted for Trump would have had an aneurysm on the spot.https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/918112884630093825 …
Hard to say since forensics show the intrusion but we don't necessarily know the very first original date.
-
-
No disrespect, but I'm not sure you've ever been able to prove that what was done to your computer was a government hack.
-
She can confirm, apologies haven't read book yet, but Blive second DSL line found (not ordered) & tools used 1 hack/delete info, seemed pro
-
Sure, but I don't believe any of those things prove it was a government operation that targeted her. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2013/05/29/sharyl-attkisson-and-her-compromised-computers/?utm_term=.dbe64e7f4e08 …
-
Wouldn't you want to know the evidence for yourself or at least know more rather than making an uninformed conclusion? IT's okay if not--just a thought.
-
I've read most of the press on this, thanks. But a Q: why haven't you released said "evidence" or permitted the experts to speak on record?
-
I haven't stopped any experts but we filed suit 2.5 yrs ago and my attorney said esp with inaccurate press reporting to further their narratives it's best to stick with facts in court. But I have published some court docs on this...
-
That's fine, your entitled to your day in court. But, please, don't tell me I'm "uninformed" when you refuse to release the evidence
-
I don't think I've refused to release the evidence. For 2+ years anybody could see what we outlined in court docs, which is best way to discuss something that propagandists are trying to shape (I think).
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.