For the record, I think both bills should have been/should be widely, publicly discussed/disclosed.
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
Weren't there a bunch of hearings last time and this time zilch? Seriously, you are saying there is NO difference between how handled?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
Im asking the question honestly as I see it stated by liberals that there is a signif difference between how the 2 were/are being handled
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @idkidd
I haven't studied it As closely As you. To me, in both cases, there wasn't the preferred openness. Voting on it so we can see
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @idkidd
we will never be able to fully dissect. I think we shd know who writes and sponsors each line in a bill like this
#willneverhallen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
I totally agree just honestly questioning whether Trumpcare is taking things to a new level of secrecy obfuscation as it's portrayed
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @idkidd
doesn't seem so to me. Feels similar from 30k foot level. I feel like the same (corporate) players are largely involved in both.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
I agree that they are. But 79 open hearing vs ZERO and a yr+ of process vs weeks/months seems like a big difference
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You could be right on that score.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.