Saying that "no sources or methods were disclosed" is not the same thing as saying "no classified information was disclosed." /1
-
-
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
McMaster gave a very carefully worded denial. No sources/methods, no ongoing military operations divulged. /2
13 replies 126 retweets 347 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
Both what McMaster said, and what the Washington Post reported, can be true at the same time. Here's why. /3
14 replies 197 retweets 532 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
Imagine POTUS said "hey, here's a really secret thing I know." He doesn't say how he knows, and we're not doing anything on it right now. /4
5 replies 83 retweets 219 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
McMaster can say what he said, and it is completely true. It might also be true that "Hey, here's this secret thing" was revealed. /5
4 replies 81 retweets 216 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
It is up to the Post to prove it true. If this turns out to be nothing, it will be the last straw in a string of stories that were wrong. /6
38 replies 86 retweets 188 likes -
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
OTOH, seeing WSJ jumping in makes me think WaPo not alone on a limb. I think it's likely true, esp with McMaster non-denial.
18 replies 120 retweets 393 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom @SharylAttkisson
It's certainly true that sources are making same claims to many outlets. Not sure this strengthens the underlying claim.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
That's our fault (the media).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.