12 times Dems/Repubs said "no evidence" in Trump-Russia probe. 10 times others claimed there was. A news analysis. https://sharylattkisson.com/11-times-dems-repubs-said-no-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion-10-times-people-claimed-there-was/ …
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
You have missed multiple statements by Democrats who have received classified briefings indicating there's a lot of smoke...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @john135795
(Which ones?) LOTS of people have made claims. That's the point. The facts are disputed by top Ds & Rs, Obama intel peeps.
4 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
To start, Feinstein's answer excluded classified info. Warner has seen intel and says Trump won't finish first term.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Feinstein said this after visiting the NSA HQ in Maryland. Why would she go there to review unclassified info?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Carlos8791 @SharylAttkisson
That's the point--Feinstein has had classified briefings. When asked about evidence, the question specifically excluded classified info.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @john135795 @SharylAttkisson
Her visit with Wolf on CNN last week is counter to your assertion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Carlos8791 @SharylAttkisson
Go back and listen again--Wolf said "without discussing classified info", answered "no". I could be wrong, but her statement not conclusive
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
in her answer that would be silly he said of course she couldn't discuss it, but had she SEEN such evidence and she said flatly--no.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.