What do you mean? (if you're asking me)
I read the Post article yes that's entirely different I see the allegation there and the possible problem.
-
-
Ok, so my original point is he sees foundation $ as still his to control, not given away, and shielded from tax
-
If true I see part one but now how then giving to the charity vs. collecting the money himself benefits him...
-
If he has it paid to foundation, he doesn't have to claim it as income but he still controls the money
-
I see. But the article doesn't claim or provide evidence he "controls the money" they imply tax benefit
-
So how did the foundation decide to make donation that settled the lawsuit?
-
I don't know, you are mixing the two stories (which is ok, but the article about the foundation didn't imply that)
-
article - "Trump sent a check from the Donald J Trump Foundation" so I think the implication is he controls $
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.