But that implies he wanted to save $20k in taxes so he gave away $400k? That doesn't make sense if $ is motivation does it?
to show the benefit he supposedly got (which I don't see in the article)
-
-
It is of no benefit to him to have lawsuit judgment on his private business settled by payment from Foundation?
-
I read the Post article yes that's entirely different I see the allegation there and the possible problem.
-
Ok, so my original point is he sees foundation $ as still his to control, not given away, and shielded from tax
-
If true I see part one but now how then giving to the charity vs. collecting the money himself benefits him...
-
If he has it paid to foundation, he doesn't have to claim it as income but he still controls the money
-
I see. But the article doesn't claim or provide evidence he "controls the money" they imply tax benefit
-
So how did the foundation decide to make donation that settled the lawsuit?
-
I don't know, you are mixing the two stories (which is ok, but the article about the foundation didn't imply that)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.
@SharylAttkisson@buckeye328 Settling business lawsuits using Fdn $ was mentioned in previous WP articles.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.