You seem to have an instinct for the capillary, @SharylAttkisson. This sort of thing isn't what drives the deficit.https://twitter.com/SharylAttkisson/status/681228845689794560 …
-
-
Replying to @Rand_Simberg
I don't really understand in what sense those are "top." They're trivial in the context of a $2T federal budget.
@SharylAttkisson2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rand_Simberg
@Rand_Simberg In the sense, as I said, that they were the top ones we covered in 2015. Of course there are many more.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
@SharylAttkisson Maybe "most outrageous" would be better than "top." I have the same problem with Coburn's "Waste Book." Trivial.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rand_Simberg
@Rand_Simberg Point taken. Philosophical difference perhaps. All waste adds up and matters to some of us.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
@SharylAttkisson Yes, but we should focus energy on low-hanging watermelons, not tiny berries.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rand_Simberg
@Rand_Simberg I don't discriminate: I always think the examples that hit home most to some viewers are the berries. So I mix them with melon1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
@SharylAttkisson I understand, but it's a pet peeve to me, because so few people can discern millions from billions from trillions.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Rand_Simberg some ppl better understand govt spending w/$250k spent bringing foreigners to space camp than $500 million defense waste
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.