@sharylattkisson @barbariancap Are you truly suggesting that all federal laws are invalid because of sanctuary cities?
-
-
-
@ParkerColeridge@BarbarianCap Me? I'm not suggesting anything. -
@sharylattkisson@barbariancap How coy you become when your stupidity is highlighted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SharylAttkisson A court interpretation is not a law. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@SharylAttkisson@pdanielson92056 Colluding with Ted Cruz? Did he hand-pick this case for his campaign? -
@KHShan@SharylAttkisson Good point Kay,thanks for asking the question,I'm no fan of TedCruz. -
@pdanielson92056@SharylAttkisson The reason I ask is this article that implies Cruz will use religion controversies. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/08/opinion/will-infighting-help-the-republicans-in-2016.html?_r=0 … -
@KHShan@SharylAttkisson I wouldn't be surprised by that on his part. -
@pdanielson92056@SharylAttkisson Cruz thinks he can win the nomination with evangelicals, conservatives & tea party. Not a general election -
@KHShan@SharylAttkisson I believe that,I personally don't think he'll succeed at the nomination any more than Trump. -
@pdanielson92056@SharylAttkisson He's making conservatives look like lunatics. -
@KHShan@SharylAttkisson I agree,although that lunacy has shown time and time again. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@SharylAttkisson@mflynny Yes. As an immigrant, now citizen, I swore an oath. As a gay woman, I rely on officials keeping theirs, -
@johannalapp@mflynny@SharylAttkisson We likely disagree on gay marriage,but if she can't in good conscience do her job she needs to quit -
@CoolCzech1@mflynny@SharylAttkisson Or stop forbidding her staff to follow their consciences, obey the law, grant the licenses.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SharylAttkisson@KurtSchlichter Law? You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SharylAttkisson Glaring inconsistencies in how the law is being applied in America. Admin may be surprised by how many folks are watching.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SharylAttkisson How About Obama upholding some laws?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sharylattkisson@barbariancap The proper question: can Davis, as gov't agent, personally decide to deprive individuals of civil rights. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@otherpplsmoney@sharylattkisson@barbariancap I see. So you're saying that because of Lois Lerner, all federal laws are invalid. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@otherpplsmoney Gee, because she is in contempt of court. A government agent like Davis can't unilaterally deprive individuals of rights. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@otherpplsmoney Lerner wasn't convicted, unlike Davis. Moreover, Davis admitted her crime in court. She has no legal defense. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.