Pathetic: @voxdotcom techie @binarybits reads SUMMARY of @SharylAttkisson book & says hacking unlikely: http://www.vox.com/2014/10/28/7086325/sharyl-attkisson-laptop-hacking?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=vox&utm_content=article-share-top … cc: @NolteNC
-
-
Replying to @joelpollak
@joelpollak I'm open to changing my mind when I see more details. But the evidence that's emerged so far is pretty weak.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @binarybits
.
@binarybits I applaud your openness, but wouldn't it have been better to read@SharylAttkisson's book first? Not reading suggests prejudice1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @joelpollak
@joelpollak@SharylAttkisson It looked to me like the key details were summarized in the Post piece.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @binarybits
.
@binarybits Also, summaries generally give you what the details told. Read the details before you can disagree@joelpollak@SharylAttkisson5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iminthegulag
@iminthegulag@binarybits@joelpollak i'm sure i've done it without thinking about it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
.
@SharylAttkisson Sure. But to debunk anything, by nature of what a 'summary' is, it's amateur not to seek details.@binarybits@joelpollak1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@iminthegulag @binarybits @joelpollak thank you for the shout out on it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.