Additionally, CDC was originally insisting earlier protection for health care workers was enough--but others disagreed and CDC had to revise
-
-
-
Replying to @IowaVoter
@IowaVoter nurses unions, published scientists in infectious disease respiratory expertise, public health advisers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
@SharylAttkisson Sources other than article u posted saying the testing is inconclusive as to airborne transmission in medical settings?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IowaVoter
@IowaVoter Yes They don't use the word "airborne," which they say is an antiquated term. They speak of "aerosolized." Body liquids can be2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
@SharylAttkisson@IowaVoter there is no proof that it is in fact airborne / aerosolized - means the same thing; trying to create a panic?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@RobinAnnBarron @IowaVoter (doesn't mean the same thing. you may want to read up.) or not.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.