You do have to wonder about lack of intellectual curiosity of so many in power when CDC senior scientist confesses he/colleagues literally trashed evidence of vaccine/autism link. Rep. Posey reads scientist's statement (3:45). #NoHearings #Crickets https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546421/rep-bill-posey-calling-investigation-cdcs-mmr-reasearch-fraud …
-
-
Many vaccines are good for many; some vaccines are bad for some. Depends on the vaccine; depends on the person. Figuring it out in a way that vaccinates the most safely with the most necessary and effective vaccines makes sense...
-
I really am not arguing with you that some people have awful side affects from vaccines. But currently there is no alternative.
-
Agree in part: the govt hasn't worked hard enough to encourage scientists to study the factors that make some kids reactive. Mitochondrial disorder and TS are two--so find ways to vaccinate that subset without challenging their pre-existing conditions(?)
-
Totally agree that people who cannot be vaccinated need to have a safe way to be vaccinated but maybe for some cases there is not a way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I too believe and hope that, but the only reason why your child shouldn’t have a vaccine is if it would threaten their life.
-
Again--if you don't mind my remark---it's not all or nothing, perhaps. Many scientists believe there are safer ways to achieve coverage. Most wouldn't have to choose all or nothing. Most wouldn't have to forego vaccines altogether. Plus the profile is different for diff vaccines.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.