LATimes actually had some good polling demographics leading up to the 2016 election. You could see in those numbers that Trump had a great chance to win despite most all #MSM/polling predicting a huge Hillary win.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Any poll regarding trump will likely poll lower than reality for fear of being called racist. Obama’s polls similarly polled higher for exactly the same reason
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Remember, THE New York Times admonished LA TIMES 2016... basically as amateurs on their Presidential tracking poll - who in the end hit the nail on the headpic.twitter.com/J0VmSW7B5r
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How accurate? He won, didn't he, dummy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rasmussen has CONSISTENTLY been more accurate than other polls
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly, it was the most accurate poll in 2016, re: Trump.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
they take polls until they get the rating they're looking for. they target certain eof people. part of liberal news tactics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the last 22 elections, 19 of them the party of the president lost seats in Congress. Almost always happens. I have no doubt liberal media will say it is because of Trump, but when Obama, Clinton, FDR, LBJ lose those seats its because of something else? http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/mid-term_elections.php …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The NAACP number is earth shattering. 21% is huge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But Trump isn't running this election and you have to look at State by State numbers particularly for the Senate. For example Rick Scott -R in Florida is only polling 4% approval among black voters. No Trump effect here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All polls make invalidating assumptions, weighting or even not weighting their results by using demographics and predictions of motivation. Rasmussen doesnt buy into much of this, but it is a factor in voting. Trouble is when the guesses are wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just look at his rallies. That tells the whole story. If someone is willing to wait in line overnight in 90 degree heat you know there are thousands of more supporters out there who are not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rasmussen is likely voters. True it may be high but also true more likely to benefit from economic growth
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We don’t believe in any poll numbers since
@realDonaldTrump announced his candidacy for@POTUSThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the age of cell phones and caller ID, makes you wonder who is answering these polls anyway.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.