@SharylAttkisson This is great - but why did The Hill remove your terrific 7/30/18 article on "Whatever happened to the 'unmaskings' probe?" from its archive?http://thehill.com/social-tags/sharyl-attkisson …
-
-
-
I noticed too. let me find out.
-
I notice it's been restored. This is good. It is a terrific article and should be known to every American who cares about clean government.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It happened...not conjecture or theory. Until these people are brought to justice, there is no real justice and the US political system is no better than a banana republic or some unnamed oligarchy or plutocracy.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Are you asking for a friend...? Great article.
#journalistsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RadiNabulsi hilarious that you’re a Trumper while covering, and seemingly caring about, players in a sport with 80% black athletes. Bet you want NFL players to stand for the anthem too lmao. -
Yo, I’ve been following
@SharylAttkisson for years. I still don’t know what her political leanings are. She simply investigates corruption. On both sides. You should research her stuff -
Tweet unavailable
-
Stop. She leans hard right don’t be naive. A quick scroll through her tweets is filled w nothing but Charlie Kirk, Fusion GPS, and racist ass Laura Ingraham. Sure she does plenty of investigative work, but damn near every opinion she throws out is vaguely supporting the right
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is outstanding


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was my first guess. After losing they had to scramble, we now see results of their desperations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a lazy article. This would involve more than a few people. You would need a lot more than that. Not to mention a lot of them are Republicans. Rod rosenstein just wanted to take down Trump lol. Delusional much.
-
With respect, there are plenty of Republicans who despise Trump for various reasons. Two senators from Arizona, come to mind, as do Pulitzer Prize journalists. Just because someone has an (R) next to their name means nothing. Add the threat of jail time if exposed and...
-
Who appointed rod rosenstein? The judges have to approve. There are checks and balances built in to prevent something like this. Did Comey wake up one morning and decide to take down Trump?
-
Comey's 1st meeting w/Trump was to "warn" him about unverified dossier. He didn't tell Trump it was financed by Hillary. He then leaked his "warning" Trump to CNN so they could report on unverified dossier. Buzzfeed then published entire document. Kosher?
-
That is one person. He wasn't the fisa judge. And you have proof Comey leaked it? My piloint is that this would take a large group of individuals working in perfect harmony not leaving evidence of conspiracy. Did they force trump tower meeting or hiring of manafort?
-
"Hail Mary". "Insurance policy". "We'll stop him". Unverified op research used for FISA on a presidential candidate. Spy inserted in campaign. No evidence? Russian lawyer met with Glenn Simpson just before & after Trump meeting. Entertaining read:http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/391566-the-fbis-fractured-fairytale …
-
So your source is another opinion article from sharyl. is the spy Carter page? There were other sources for fisa and Nunes didn't see the whole unredacted report. Meeting with Glenn Simpson proves what?
-
Look, if I really believed Obama was a Russian asset & investigation bungled this badly, I would be livid at FBI, CIA, DOJ. I'd start to think they bungled it so badly to protect him. That's how bad this is. Instead I see defenders. I don't think most Dems really believe it.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.