@SharylAttkisson showing off her true colors. That's why I asked her before - if she's dissing President Trump, and backing the real traitors of the Democratic Party, who interferred with his election, who's her target audience? @stranahanhttps://twitter.com/EricHolder/status/1018997779836882944 …
-
-
We don't know each other but much can be learned through observation. It's events like these, where you've shared three comments today, in support of Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Eric Holder' views against the President that show your true colors as a Deep State shill.
-
Hillary Clinton, Comey, and Eric Holder - not President Obama.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Many people portraying themselves as conservatives, trying to attract that market, but who at heart oppose American populism. Incidents like the Trump/Putin summit press reaction, allow observers to see where individual loyalties lie.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, but retweeting tired old lines from the president who got us here earns an unfollow.
-
This is the problem with playing both sides. Who's your target audience? You're supporting the Official Narrative "Russia interfered with the election", without evidence other than the CIA's word, when they've lied before. Why should Trump supporters take you seriously?
-
Granted Sharyl does try to do a good job of not inserting herself into the narrative, but we are already deluged with condemnation of the Trump Putin meeting. Obama contributes nothing here, unless he wants to explain why he dragged so many through that war in Syria and elsewhere
-
Why not innocent until proven guilty? Putin is requesting a genuine court of law to prove Russia is innocent of interferring with the 2016 election, and that they will cooperate fully with the investigation. Sounds reasonable. Mindless people cry foul.
-
Addressed to everyone who can think for themselves. We're to implicitly put our trust in the verdict of US Intelligence that lies for a living and lives above the law? Russia's found is guilty of election interference without proof or trial. Trump's a traitor. Not buying it.
-
Trust but verify.
-
How do you verify when they withhold all the evidence? We're not permitted to view it, because it would compromise ongoing intelligence operations and methods. No, you have to accept them at their word, and they lie for a living.
-
Ay there's the rub. I note Putin harps on transparency. Whether he fully practices this, or when and where he might, I don't know. They certainly were documenting the Skripal incident thoroughly as they could, given they weren't given any access.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.