Guess it doesn't matter #Hillary knew exactly what she was doing... signed .@StateDept form acknowledging the rules #intentpic.twitter.com/74tF1fyuwz
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Guess it doesn't matter #Hillary knew exactly what she was doing... signed .@StateDept form acknowledging the rules #intentpic.twitter.com/74tF1fyuwz
They are #DemocratParty #Leftist controlled last 9 years. Political decisions on police matters and #FakeNews aids the Party. Anyone disagree?
This is how the right wing admits defeat. When they start baselessly alleging a conspiracy, you know it’s over. They oversold the IG investigation to the Trump base and now it’s leading conspiracy-mongers need alibis.
Comey used private email. Obama used private email, and sent to Clinton private server, lied about it on tv. Text messages showing irrefutable bias. Investigations tainted. Clinton Foundation crimes against children. Read entire report.
It was riddled with eye-opening facts. In the hearings the past two days, we've also learned.... Investigation into Comey under way. Investigations into leaks and leakers underway. This was only one of three IG reports. Enjoy the Show! #WWG1WGA
Just like @HillaryClinton “intent” BS 
It’s classic deep state
Sharyl, separate Strozk and biased colleagues from the prosecutor that actually made the decision....1st, who was the prosecutor and rather than bias driving the decision, could an order from Obama to make that decision be IG's reason...Parsing bias vs. order is a legal artifice
... and the focus of many questions are directed towards the Mueller investigation. Everyone would like to know when that
will drop!
No bias is a LIE!! Trey Gowdy just got Horowitz to admit Peter Strzok texts meant that Strzoks intention was to “Stop Trump from becoming President”
Hypothetical: white man allegedly rapes black woman. Prosecutors give man highly favorable treatment, but indict woman's druggie friends. Investigators found to have made racist comments about them, but prosecutors themselves "clean". What conclusions could reasonably be drawn?
IG keeps stating no bias in prosecutors decision, but if info given to prosecutors is biased how does that not affect their decision
Exactly
I'd love to see some reporter shove a microphone in Peter Strzok's face and ask him about his anti-Trump comments. I'm sure Strzok would refuse to talk, but it would still be great TV.
I wonder who? Does the name begin with "R" and end with "osenstein"?
Thank you for pointing that out. Shouldn’t IG report have been about whether FBI/DOJ followed normal procedures (eg venue, application of statutes, immunity deals, interviews?) whether biased or not? The answer is clearly no! Next question, why? Uh 

The FBI didn’t give the prosecution a crime to prosecute. Because the Bias in the investigation took care of that. The FBI removes language like *gross negligence for one purpose only.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.