Just like when FBI Director Wray incorrectly testified that there have been no 702 surveillance abuses. *Crickets* http://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/365131-fbi-chiefs-claim-on-surveillance-abuse-doesnt-fit-the-evidence …https://twitter.com/CommonSense_Gal/status/1008911423735586817 …
-
-
I'm just as disappointed that the narrative was successfully shifted to kiddie internment & IG is ignored.
-
General public not smart enough to understand this stage of the game. We'll get there. This is beginning of a whole lot of very interesting procedural events before the final reveal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hey, a Congress member can only pay attention to one person at a time. Surely you don't believe that'd be the witness?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whether each was under oath is a critical thing to know. Much larger context in which this is all unfolding. Would not be shocking to learn if Horowitz was under oath and Wray had evaded that requirement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.