Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
SharylAttkisson's profile
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Verified account
@SharylAttkisson

Tweets

Sharyl AttkissonVerified account

@SharylAttkisson

Investigative Journalist @FullMeasureNews *Note* RTs not=endorsement; RTs may be interesting, silly, wrong, outrageous. Question authority. Think for yourself.

Washington, DC
SharylAttkisson.com
Joined October 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      #2 (read carefully): Horowitz: (1:13:34) We did not find no bias with regards to the October events.

      12 replies 156 retweets 330 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      #3 (read carefully): Horowitz: (02:25:30) What we say here is not that there was no bias...

      4 replies 145 retweets 318 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      #4: Horowitz (referring to FBI head of counterespionage Peter Strzok focusing more attention and energy on Trump-Russia collusion and away from Clinton email probe):(1:18:56) We were not convinced that was not a biased decision.

      9 replies 194 retweets 387 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      #5: (3:00:09) Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware): …your investigation found fault in an exchange of text messages that you identified that demonstrated some political bias. Is that right? Horowitz: Correct.

      2 replies 176 retweets 371 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      #6: Horowitz: (3:02:12) The one area where we were concerned about bias was in the Oct. time period, and the weighing of Agent Strzok between focusing on the Russia investigation versus the Weiner laptop [Clinton emails] and our concern about his decision given the text messages.

      6 replies 175 retweets 349 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      #7 (2:05:15) Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) What you’re telling us is you found bias…those who you found the bias among said ‘well, we didn’t let it bleed into our work performance and you don’t have evidence to disprove that.’ Horowitz: Correct.

      11 replies 199 retweets 358 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      #8: (2:02:46) Horowitz: When we got October we had concerns that there may be bias impacting the decision to prioritize the Russia investigation…

      1 reply 145 retweets 305 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      #9: (2:02:46) Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho): You’re not saying you didn’t find bias… Horowitz: …I think it’s clear… Strzok had, as we say here, a biased state of mind.

      5 replies 257 retweets 471 likes
      Show this thread
    9. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      And yet--FBI Director Christopher Wray: “The [DOJ IG} report did not find any evidence of political bias or improper considerations.”

      28 replies 179 retweets 375 likes
      Show this thread
    10. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      All of that aside, there's nothing magical about somebody--even Horowitz-- stating certain words that makes it true or untrue. The IG report is rife with examples of bias even Horowitz hadn't explicitly said so. (But he did.)

      14 replies 272 retweets 718 likes
      Show this thread
      Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Jun 18

      Also curious that Horowitz settled on repeated use of confusing double negatives rather than clearer direct statements.

      7:30 PM - 18 Jun 2018
      • 326 Retweets
      • 881 Likes
      • ❌ Laney ❌ AC will bean L. MJoM andyw67 Aeronaut Cassandra Fitzgerald Mrs Brand⭐️⭐️⭐️
      87 replies 326 retweets 881 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. STEALTH JEFF‏ @drawandstrike Jun 19
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          I'm thinking he's handed off plenty of evidence to Huber for grand jury cases and he cannot tip his hand about any of this until indictments are unsealed.

          9 replies 27 retweets 77 likes
        3. 1 more reply
        1. New conversation
        2. ctl: 0.0009765625 non-native‏ @jetx86 Jun 18
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          i was noticing that.. "#2 (read carefully): Horowitz: (1:13:34) We did not find no bias with regards to the October events."

          2 replies 7 retweets 18 likes
        3.  ❌ ADDgolfer  🍻‏ @ADDgolfer Jun 18
          Replying to @jetx86 @SharylAttkisson

          There was no bias We did not find that...to be true

          0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. JimBurke@JimBurke21‏ @Jkburke21Jim Jun 18
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          Two negatives=a positive

          0 replies 3 retweets 19 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. winflop‏ @Winflop Jun 18
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          Horowitz is applying the wrong standard. It's not whether bias influenced their decisions, it's whether their actions gave an appearance of potential bias. The FBI (and DOJ) must not create the appearance of bias in their actions because it erodes public trust in law enforcement

          0 replies 2 retweets 11 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. CommunityCorner‏ @EdenfieldPl Jun 18
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @realgrace_kelly

          And slipped up when he said 'when' re: Comey aka the prodigal son on HRC emailspic.twitter.com/aaqUYUJbKl

          0 replies 3 retweets 5 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1.  🌻Kimkat ☯️ 🇺🇸 🐱 ❌‏ @Kimberly0059 Jun 18
          Replying to @babineau_peter @SharylAttkisson

          pic.twitter.com/vzGz5ftwHR

          1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1.  🇺🇸  ❌Vote GOP ❌ 🇺🇸‏ @PMgeezer Jun 18
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          High IQ individuals use double negatives to confuse the more stupid among us.

          0 replies 2 retweets 5 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2.  🇺🇸 🦅lois bolin 🦅 🇺🇸‏ @LoisBolin Jun 18
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          Most interesting - his way of softening the reality - Those double negatives usually equal a positive- Wray missed that me thinks🧐🧐

          1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes
        3. 1 more reply
        1. Cruadin‏ @cruadin Jun 19
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          I noticed that odd construction several times - "We did not find no bias." I guess it's a very precise, lawyerly construction, but it makes it easier to misconstrue.

          0 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Mike Canaday‏ @pmcanaday Jun 19
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          Why yes, the use of double negatives is a trick.

          0 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. mr. kite‏ @porchbarker Jun 18
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          Verbal lifelines to aid media narrative for the simple.

          0 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Elite_Dems_R_Anti- 🇺🇸‏ @DeeDeCrist Jun 18
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          Horowitz would be asked to prove a positive accusation. Whereas, he doesn’t have to prove a double negative. He knows that well.

          1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
        3. ifThenLogic‏ @ifTHENlogic Jun 19
          Replying to @DeeDeCrist @SharylAttkisson

          THIS! THIS! THIS! 👆Now *this* makes sense! Thank you! That was not the time to go in that direction.

          1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
        4. Elite_Dems_R_Anti- 🇺🇸‏ @DeeDeCrist Jun 19
          Replying to @ifTHENlogic @SharylAttkisson

          You’re Welcome!

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. End of conversation
        1. Rod‏ @Rodr_76 Jun 18
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson

          lawyers, got thier own language

          0 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info