I think all the focus on McCabe, the IG, leaks and Comey's handling of Clinton email investigation is a big shiny ball distracting the public from arguably more important questions about our intel community's surveillance and unmaskings in 2016 and in the past decade+
-
-
Doesn’t Huber have a role in this?
-
Only to prosecute and referrals made. He needs the referral first.
-
If there are FISA violations, the referrals can be made. We aren’t told about all referrals in real time. Notice they’re months in the making when they have been announced.
-
^No indictments re FISA vios yet, but none at the hands of Huber yet either...
-
There are 35,000 sealed indictments, I'm not sure how many of those are Hubers, if any. But a girl can dream!!!!
-
If there’s at least one via Huber, odds are that others are too...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Have you considered that there are criminal investigations going on and a prosecutor + grand jury in place, and current DOJ doesn’t want to jeopardize those investigations by providing info to congress that will leak?
-
I have heard that theory as well and it makes sense! They've been shown to be hiding embarrassing info already, in fact, my theory is Strzok and Page were never lovers, but instead, FBI used that as a ploy to redact incriminating texts. I dunno, just a theory.
-
It’s a possibility. Lots we don’t know and I consider that a good thing. These investigations have been going on for over a year and no leaks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or perhaps surveillance and monitoring has been ongoing to find those trying to cover up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.