Sources tell me I look just like Brad Pitt!
-
-
-
--without any evidence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's almost as if the msm is colluding with the big gov't politicians.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
"Evidence free claims"is one of their favorite ways of describing statements made by Trump. Then they turn around and assert the credibility of their own claims by stating that they've been confirmed by "multiple sources (always unnamed) familiar with the president's thinking."
-
They're nuts. As if the President doesn't have access to classified info. They get tidbits, he sees all. I feel that's why he wants an investigation. He knows what happened but wants it to come out thru the proper channels. If he unclassifies they'll slaughter him in the press.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's true, but it doesn't make it any better that both sides are presenting unproven and unevidenced theories as fact.
-
And yet, despite that, the media still reports it - and wonders why people question it's credibility.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just like, "
@therealroseanne said something racist ... and is a big@realDonaldTrump supporter." Never heard the qualifier of being a Hillary supporter when Harvey Weinstein, et al victims came out or even after Weinstein arrested.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought it was hilarious a few wks ago when NBC retracted the story about the FBI listening to convos b/t Trump & Cohen because ABC claimed to have independently confirmed it. Then ABC retracted it too. But they'd independently confirmed it right?! Oops! Nothing to see here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've noticed that. They can't just report what was said, they *must* add that clause when the statement is from Trump.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s not true of Gen. Mike Hayden’s book, The Assault On Intelligence. It is sourced and points out how POTUS makes decisions in impulse or emotion. His proof seems to rely on “A lot of people are saying...” comments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, well, I'm already stressed out with John Roberts, a grown man, saying "tick tock." Honestly... "Let's look at the 'tick tock' of these recent events"...? Are "chronology" and "timeline" now passé? Unpack. Full stop. THERE THERE. Ma'am, WADR, you people are killing me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Criticism of whataboutism also only seems to come from one side.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As usual, the framing is ungenerous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most hilarious of all are self important media types demanding proof of something that hasn’t happened yet. Prove what he was thinking. Prove what you thought (hoped) he’d do ..... if he does anything. According to many, he’s not capable of doing anything but drawing fire.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Similar to referring to conservatives as “right wing” “far right” or “controversial” But nobody is ever described as “liberal” or “far left” -no labels and no degrees of leftism. The party who says they don’t like labels, labels everybody who doesn’t think like they do.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.