So mandate and term don’t matter 4 instance? Or inclusivity? Imagine an interim gov with a term of 2-3 years, mandate of changing the constitution, composition of only old, male politicians from certain factions, no civil society voice, no oversight. Doesn’t inspire hope.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TareqKakar @HabibKhanT
Afghanistan has changed vastly since King Z. Rule of which law? The substance of law matters. How do you define people? Taliban did not seem to think women are as “people” as men during their term, for instance.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TareqKakar @HabibKhanT
I am more concerned about common ground on constitutional amendment mechanisms & restrictions on amendment as per constitution I.e citizens rights can only be amended to be further improved
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TareqKakar @HabibKhanT
Constitution should be open to amendment, peace process or not. Replacing d constitution is a redline that our gov should not cross.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TareqKakar @HabibKhanT
Why rewrite? The greatest consensus in post civil war Af was developed around our current constitution, a broad national convo shaped it, all groups but TBN agree 2 amending using constitutional mechanisms. Why rewrite Constitution & reinvent d wheel based on demand of 1 segment?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.