This just happened at the @Walgreens on Gough & Fell Streets in San Francisco. #NoConsequences @chesaboudinpic.twitter.com/uSbnTQQk4J
I am referring to net income. I’m simply not sure why you would advocate for a tax that progressively increases the more you make though. What is the rational basis for that, as opposed to everyone paying the same percentage of total income
-
-
Because people who have more can afford to give more, its not a difficult concept.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also, the rich never pay their actual tax rate. If there was a flat tax, their effective rate would be much lower. As is, with a so called progressive tax code Warren Buffet still pays like 1% of his total income
-
That’s only possible if the flat tax rate doesn’t include net income
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because if you are earning 60% of all income in this country it makes sense you would pay 60% of the total taxes, right?
-
A flat income tax would insure that everyone is paying the exact same tax rate scaled to their income Everyone pays 5% of their net income for example. What argument is there against that
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
