콘텐츠로 건너뛰기
트위터 서비스를 이용하할 경우 귀하는 트위터의 쿠키 사용에 동의하게 됩니다. 트위터와 파트너들은 전 세계에서 서비스를 제공하고 애널리틱스, 개인화, 광고를 위해 쿠키를 사용합니다.
  • 홈 홈 홈, 현재 페이지.
  • 회사소개

저장된 검색어

  • 삭제
  • 이 대화의 참여자들
    인증된 계정비공개 트윗 @
추천 사용자
  • 인증된 계정비공개 트윗 @
  • 인증된 계정비공개 트윗 @
  • 언어: 한국어
    • 繁體中文
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
  • 이미 트위터에 가입하셨나요? 로그인
    이미 트위터에 가입하셨나요?
    · 비밀번호 찾기

    트위터에 처음이세요?
    가입하기
SethAbramson 님의 프로필
Seth Abramson
Seth Abramson
Seth Abramson
인증된 계정
@SethAbramson

Tweets

Seth Abramson인증된 계정

@SethAbramson

Lawyer. Professor @UofNH. Columnist @Newsweek. NYT bestselling author. Proof of Conspiracy, @StMartinsPress: https://tinyurl.com/y3co6tcr . Analyses @BBC. Views mine.

"[An] angry...@realdonaldtrump hater." —@WhiteHouse
sethabramson.net/bio
가입일: 2015년 5월

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • 회사소개
  • 고객센터
  • 이용약관
  • 개인정보 처리방침
  • 쿠키
  • 광고 정보
숨기기
이전
다음

프로필 보기

저장된 검색어

  • 삭제
  • 이 대화의 참여자들
    인증된 계정비공개 트윗 @
추천 사용자
  • 인증된 계정비공개 트윗 @
  • 인증된 계정비공개 트윗 @

이 트윗 프로모션하기

차단하기

  • 위치 정보를 포함하여 트윗하기

    웹 및 타사 애플리케이션을 통해 도시나 구체적인 장소 이름 등의 위치 정보를 트윗에 추가할 수 있습니다. 언제든 트위터 위치 기록을 삭제할 수도 있습니다. 자세히 알아보기

    내 리스트

    리스트 만들기


    100자 미만, 선택 입력사항

    개인정보 처리방침

    트윗 링크 복사하기

    트윗 담아가기

    Embed this Video

    웹사이트에 트윗을 담아 가려면 아래 코드를 복사하세요. 자세히 알아보기

    웹사이트에 동영상을 담아 가려면 아래 코드를 복사하세요. 자세히 알아보기

    서버에 접속하는 도중 문제가 발생했습니다.

    웹사이트나 앱에 트위터 콘텐츠를 담아 가면 트위터 개발자 이용약관 및 개발자 정책에 동의하게 됩니다.

    미리보기

    이 광고가 표시되는 이유

    트위터에 로그인하기

    · 비밀번호 찾기
    계정이 없으세요? 가입하기 »

    트위터 가입하기

    아직 트위터 아이디가 없나요? 지금 가입해서, 친구나 관심분야에 일어나는 일들을 실시간으로 업데이트 받으세요.

    가입하기
    이미 트위터에 가입하셨나요? 로그인 »

    트위터 SMS 번호:

    국가 코드 For customers of
    미국 40404 (모두)
    캐나다 21212 (모두)
    영국 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    브라질 40404 Nextel, TIM
    아이티 40404 Digicel, Voila
    아일랜드 51210 Vodafone, O2
    인도 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    인도네시아 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    이탈리아 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » 다른 국가의 단축번호 보기

    확인

     

    환영합니다!

    대부분의 시간을 보내게 될 이 타임라인은 내가 관심을 가지는 주제에 대해 실시간 업데이트를 받아보는 곳입니다.

    트윗이 마음에 들지 않나요?

    프로필 사진에 마우스를 올리고 팔로잉 버튼을 눌러 계정을 언팔로우하세요.

    짧은 글로 많은 의미를 전달하세요

    마음에 드는 트윗을 보면 하트를 탭하세요. 작성자에게 내가 마음에 들어 한다는 사실을 전할 수 있습니다.

    더 널리 말을 전하세요

    내 팔로워에게 다른 사람의 트윗을 공유하는 가장 빠른 방법은 리트윗입니다. 아이콘을 탭해서 바로 전달하세요.

    대화에 참여하세요

    트윗에 답글을 달아 내 생각을 전달하세요. 흥미로운 주제를 찾아서 대화에 동참하세요.

    최신 소식 알아보기

    지금 화제가 되고 있는 토픽에 대해 실시간으로 알아보세요.

    내가 좋아하는 주제에 대한 소식을 더 받아보세요

    계정을 더 팔로우하고 내가 관심을 가지는 주제에 대해 실시간 업데이트를 받아보세요.

    무슨 일이 일어나고 있는지 알아보세요

    다양한 주제에 대한 최신 대화를 바로 확인하세요.

    모멘트를 놓치지 마세요

    인기 있는 이야기가 올라오는 즉시 받아보세요.

    1. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      390/ So the case that Trump is a national security threat has been made—amply—at the level needed for impeachment. But Barr has managed to keep even more evidence from us; and the media doesn't know how to discuss it; and America hasn't been *prepared* for this topic. Not at all.

      답글 36개 리트윗 284개 1,031 마음
      이 스레드 보기
    2. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      391/ So instead we'll spend today, tomorrow, and the next day discussing an *obstruction* case we all knew existed a year ago—and you or I would (I *promise* you, as I know from trial practice) already be in jail for—even as media coverage of Vol. 1 (conspiracy) is *weak sauce*.

      답글 19개 리트윗 138개 787 마음
      이 스레드 보기
    3. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      392/ And here I am—making an ass of myself with a 400-TWEET THREAD so that someone will NOTICE and wake up and realize that the standard for impeachment on the only thing that was ever going to lead to impeachment has been met. And it's *not* obstruction—it's a compromised POTUS.

      답글 143개 리트윗 667개 2,241 마음
      이 스레드 보기
    4. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      393/ Now you understand why I wrote PROOF OF COLLUSION—and will publish PROOF OF CONSPIRACY in August. Now you see why I barely focused on obstruction in my books and much of my tweeting—this was *always* a national security case underwritten by *bribery and aiding and abetting*.

      답글 44개 리트윗 234개 1,084 마음
      이 스레드 보기
    5. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      394/ There's a reason the counterintelligence cases against Trump are ongoing. There's a reason Barr wouldn't let us see so much of what we need to see because of "GRAND JURY" or "INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUE" redaction—*he* knows that that's the danger to Trump here, not obstruction.

      답글 45개 리트윗 269개 979 마음
      이 스레드 보기
    6. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      395/ Every time Trump lied; every time his family or aides covered for him by lying about what he knew; every time he created—willfully—a pressure point for Russia to press upon; every secret meeting his team set up and tried to hide; *all* of this provided Putin with blackmail.

      답글 30개 리트윗 315개 1,112 마음
      이 스레드 보기
    7. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      396/ What I establish in PROOF OF CONSPIRACY is that it isn't *some* of Trump's foreign policy that's compromised by his lies and secret deals—it's *all* of it. His Israel policy. His Middle East policy. His Russia policy. Even his policy toward NATO and the EU. It's compromised.

      답글 126개 리트윗 402개 1,260 마음
      이 스레드 보기
    8. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      397/ What America needed was a media that would do the hard work of painting a picture of how Trump became a compromised POTUS by acts of bribery, aiding/abetting, illegal solicitation of foreign donations, money laundering and more. Instead, we got wall-to-wall obstruction chat.

      답글 39개 리트윗 332개 1,125 마음
      이 스레드 보기
    9. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      398/ The lawyers I know and respect knew *a year ago* that Trump obstructed justice and only DOJ regs or the lack of political will in Congress would save him—and guess what, he's a criminal and *both* things saved him. The focus should *always* have been on *national security*.

      답글 57개 리트윗 272개 1,150 마음
      이 스레드 보기
    10. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      399/ The answer to the question of whether I have any self-awareness of how I come off is—Jesus, what in my bio suggests I lack the intelligence to have that self-awareness? I don't *care* because when American national security is at stake, you don't *worry* about embarrassment.

      답글 64개 리트윗 155개 1,170 마음
      이 스레드 보기
      Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

      400/ America's foreign policy was written—*literally*—by our enemies. Obstruction is an impeachable offense by *law*—but not *by politics* unless you control both the House and Senate, which the Democrats do not. So we should *all* have looked to our national security. We didn't.

      오후 7:51 - 2019년 4월 18일
      • 325 리트윗
      • 1,187 마음에 들어요
      • Rose Carlson Bloxy Flight Attendant Robert Weiss JackHenry Blue Water Monster Rusty Amanda Water From Air
      답글 114개 리트윗 325개 1,187 마음
        1. 새로운 대화
        2. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          401/ I'd ask anyone at CNN and MSNBC the following: when we go to war with Iran—needlessly—and men and women we love start dying in uniform, of precisely what value will be this discourse on obstruction? Will you wish that you'd done the work to understand the collusion question?

          답글 78개 리트윗 338개 1,305 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        3. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          402/ To those who saw an average citizen like me—a lawyer, writer, ex-investigator, professor, journalist, but *not* a native national security expert—working his butt off for years to try to shed light on a national security threat, and who thought "Let me make fun of this!": 🖕

          답글 92개 리트윗 174개 1,280 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        4. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          403/ The Mueller Report is out, and its first 200 pages establish a part of a story that I researched in greater detail—as Mueller saw it as outside his purview—for PROOF OF CONSPIRACY. And what we're doing is debating *nonsense*: an obstruction case that will *never be brought*.

          답글 44개 리트윗 160개 846 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        5. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          404/ Reporters could've been in the halls of Congress asking Republicans, "Why is it safe for our Russia policy to have been written by a Kremlin agent (Papadopoulos), a Kremlin lobbyist (Burt), a Putin "friend" (Simes), and a suspected Kremlin spy (Page)?" They never got asked.

          답글 63개 리트윗 527개 1,464 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        6. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          405/ Again, go to a courthouse tomorrow and watch an obstruction trial of a citizen like you or me—you'll hear *one-fiftieth* the amount of evidence that exists against Trump, and then the citizen will be convicted and remanded to custody. Trump won't be tried *because politics*.

          답글 42개 리트윗 296개 1,225 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        7. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          406/ But no one's *ever* explained why it was okay for the Kremlin to write our Russia policy. No one's *ever* explained how we can have a president who was compromised the moment he started doing secret business deals with the Kremlin mid-campaign and *lied to voters about it*.

          답글 40개 리트윗 358개 1,251 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        8. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          407/ No one's *ever* explained how we have a president whose top aides *and family* met secretly with foreign nationals, illegally negotiated US policy with foreign nationals, in many cases took money from foreign nationals, then turned US policy as to those nations on its head.

          답글 39개 리트윗 435개 1,333 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        9. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          408/ All right. That said—and ignored, I'm sure, by the folks in media actually in a position to fix their coverage and start doing so tonight—back to Vol. 1 of the Mueller Report ("conspiracy"). I have about 30 pages left before I wrap up. Thanks to everyone for bearing with me.

          답글 89개 리트윗 114개 1,039 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        10. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          409/ Mueller doesn't explain, unless I missed it—I don't think I did—that the reason Trump's man on Russia (Flynn) stuck with Kislyak even after Kushner was told Kislyak wasn't the best conduit to Putin is because Flynn had already established a relationship with Kislyak in 2015.

          답글 37개 리트윗 155개 753 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        11. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          410/ The same week Trump's national security adviser Flynn *dined with Putin in Moscow*—incredible the phrases we say when talking about the national security case against Trump—Flynn went to the Russian ambassador's house to talk U.S.-Russia policy. He was a Trump adviser, then.

          답글 43개 리트윗 194개 852 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        12. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          411/ Mueller says McFarland was with Trump when Flynn asked for guidance—not from McFarland, his deputy—on dealing with Kislyak. Mueller says he couldn't establish Trump provided guidance—maybe because the witnesses (Flynn, McFarland, etc.) have *lied* to him. He's admitted that.

          답글 45개 리트윗 162개 767 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        13. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          412/ This is the key point: on conspiracy, *all* the witnesses are liars. And they were often rewarded for it. McFarland, for instance, got rewarded for lying by being (ultimately unsuccessfully) nominated to be ambassador to Singapore. She has lied *repeatedly*. No consequences.

          답글 35개 리트윗 283개 1,110 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        14. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          413/ When Mueller "cannot establish" Trump directed Flynn, understand it's because he has no witnesses willing to tell the truth—it's not that the evidence isn't there. In fact *all* the circumstantial evidence—like who had authority to direct Flynn and was there—tells one story.

          답글 139개 리트윗 326개 1,325 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        15. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          414/ I don't want to get into the weeds on the Flynn-Egypt-Israel issue regarding the December 2016 UN resolution—I'll just note Papadopoulos had a September 2016 note ("off[er] Israel! EGYPT") at a time he wanted to please Israel and thought he had an in-road with the Egyptians.

          답글 168개 리트윗 110개 628 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        16. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          415/ I'll note two that Papadopoulos was in touch with Flynn during the transition, when the transition was trying to lean on Egypt to withdraw a resolution on Israel that Israel was upset about. Remember, Israel and Egypt are both "grand bargain" nations... so it all worked out.

          답글 96개 리트윗 121개 651 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        17. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          416/ I want to make a quick note here to say "thank you" to those sending money via my website. I'm not doing this for payment—but it'd be unkind of me not to say that that gesture is a thoughtful one. Hopefully people are getting value from this thread and seeing it as pro bono.

          답글 155개 리트윗 111개 1,134 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        18. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          417/ Okay, wow—I guess we *are* going to talk about Egypt. I didn't realize that Trump spoke to el-Sisi *personally* in December 2016. El-Sisi was a member of the "Red Sea conspiracy" (October 2015) to help elect Trump, so him having a one-on-one with Trump on Israel is... *big*.

          답글 151개 리트윗 248개 1,004 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        19. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          418/ K.T. McFarland admits to asking *everyone* who was at Mar-a-Lago for advice on a *huge* issue for the campaign—what to do about Obama's new sanctions on Russia. Mystically, magically, improbably, most likely perjuriously...she says she never asked the man actually in charge.

          답글 158개 리트윗 205개 919 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        20. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          419/ I'm not sure I knew that Flynn discussed the Middle East with Kislyak on the same December 2016 call that involved sanctions and led to Flynn being charged with a felony. Again, we should all note how frequently the Middle East intersects with Russian sanctions. No accident.

          답글 176개 리트윗 232개 1,056 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        21. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          420/ (TRUE STORY) When I was in college, I was a radio DJ—and the only music I played was psychedelic music from 1966 through 1971 (I *spat* on everything before and after). I only had *one* listener I knew of: a pizza delivery guy who'd been at Woodstock.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqDa5hCSQX0 …

          답글 975개 리트윗 720개 5,050 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        22. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          421/ Wait... what? This is a bizarre conversation at a bizarre moment, and I'm torn between believing K.T. McFarland was for once telling the truth and allowing that she likely was, instead, per usual, lying.pic.twitter.com/Y2SYf96CoG

          답글 55개 리트윗 124개 663 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        23. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          422/ The basis for the lie would be that it's incredibly convenient to have Trump—four months after the intelligence community told him Russia was attacking America—expressing "sincere" doubt on the question, as it would harm substantially his criminal "mens rea" (state-of-mind).

          답글 50개 리트윗 110개 676 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        24. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          423/ I'm leaning toward K.T. McFarland lying—first, because that's what she does, and second, because *since when* is Trump interested in having "leverage" over the Russians? His plan was to drop all sanctions on them... for free. What precisely was he demanding from them? Ever?pic.twitter.com/jZWpXSRqWJ

          답글 57개 리트윗 166개 794 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        25. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          424/ Mueller details another instance of a conspiracy witness destroying (in a way) evidence: Flynn kept *off* his email briefing to transition officials that he'd discussed sanctions with Kislyak. Why? He knew that he'd committed a crime under the Logan Act—why *memorialize* it?

          답글 61개 리트윗 161개 763 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        26. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          425/ On pg. 173, Mueller underscores—yet again—that he was looking at *conspiracy* only (and "coordination," but coordination defined synonymously with conspiracy). So—not bribery, or aiding and abetting, or money laundering, or illegal solicitation of in-kind campaign donations.

          답글 39개 리트윗 184개 718 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        27. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          426/ Recall the 4 categories of collusion: Collusion (conspiracy): impeachable and a crime Collusion (other crimes): impeachable and a crime Collusion (national security threat): impeachable Collusion (ethical violation): not impeachable and not a crime* *Political issue only.

          답글 42개 리트윗 182개 766 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        28. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          427/ So Mueller looked at *one* of four categories of collusion—and, at that, only the *narrowest* form of conspiracy ("with the Russian government [the IRA or the GRU]"), and not conspiracies that could have occurred on other grounds and with other parties, Russian or otherwise.

          답글 96개 리트윗 142개 681 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        29. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          428/ Wow—I'm going to *love* hearing prosecutors defend the Special Counsel's finding that you can basically "smoke if you got 'em" when it comes to receiving and distributing stolen electronic materials because, hey, what federal statute could *possibly* apply there? I mean wow.pic.twitter.com/aRtzoTIQXI

          답글 42개 리트윗 186개 803 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        30. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          429/ Now, I *will* defend Mueller—on this point—as to this much: state-level Receiving Stolen Property statutes probably *would* apply to electronic materials (in most jurisdictions) so Mueller could actually just be saying that this isn't a *federal* issue—not that it's legal.

          답글 23개 리트윗 98개 645 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        31. Seth Abramson‏인증된 계정 @SethAbramson 4월 19일

          430/ But a *much* better use of CNN and MSNBC tonight would have been discussions *broadly* like this. Why wasn't this Receiving Stolen Property? Why wasn't distributing such materials the equivalent of Identity Fraud? Questions like these have yet to be discussed on major media.

          답글 34개 리트윗 201개 894 마음
          이 스레드 보기
        32. 답글 22개 더 보기

      로딩하는데 시간이 지연되고 있습니다.

      트위터의 트래픽이 폭주했거나 일시적인 문제가 발생했을 수 있습니다. 다시 시도하거나 트위터 상태 페이지를 방문하여 자세한 내용을 확인해 보세요.

        프로모션 트윗

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • 회사소개
        • 고객센터
        • 이용약관
        • 개인정보 처리방침
        • 쿠키
        • 광고 정보