Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
SethAbramson's profile
Seth Abramson
Seth Abramson
Seth Abramson
Verified account
@SethAbramson

Tweets

Seth AbramsonVerified account

@SethAbramson

NYT bestselling author. Lawyer. Journalist at PROOF, the top-ranked culture pub on Substack: http://sethabramson.substack.com . More @BBC @CNN @HBO @CBC @PBS @NPR @CBS.

All opinions mine.
sethabramson.net/bio
Joined May 2015

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      58/ All questions for Barr now should be about "Volume 1, pt. 3" of the Mueller Report. *All* the action today—and I bet nearly all the redactions—will be in this part of the Report. Obstruction is going to go through to Congress, and the IRA/GRU allegations were never serious.

      6 replies 304 retweets 1,233 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      59/ The *very first* question asked to Barr about the Report...and he's basically saying, "You have to read the Report." Then why are we having this press conference? Why is Barr talking about only the parts of the Report he wants to talk about, and deferring on all other topics?

      24 replies 353 retweets 1,719 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      60/ Barr says the only question in the Report was whether there was criminal conduct. That's... really odd. Because we were told the *counterintelligence* investigations were part of the Report. This makes it sound like it *wasn't*, because "criminal" =/= "counterintelligence."

      16 replies 328 retweets 1,435 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      61/ Barr admits that he doesn't know whether Mueller wanted the obstruction issue to go to Congress.

      27 replies 250 retweets 1,143 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      62/ Barr: "I have no problem with Bob Mueller personally testifying [before Congress]." Okay... not sure what "personally" means?

      48 replies 253 retweets 1,433 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      63/ William Barr says the Mueller Report is *his*, not Mueller's, which is why Mueller isn't present at the presser. He also says that there's *no* obligation for him to make the Report public. The DOJ then calls the presser. Wow. That was purely Trump PR, followed by the hook.

      48 replies 582 retweets 2,109 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      64/ Barr is going to get *skewered* for this presser. And he deserves to be.

      75 replies 476 retweets 2,815 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      65/ AG Barr simply stood up there and presented excuses about Trump's conduct, while still refusing to show us the Report until later today. Neal Katyal points out on MSNBC that Barr refused to mention the "does not exonerate" part of the Report—which is... a *pretty big deal*.

      17 replies 567 retweets 2,089 likes
      Show this thread
    9. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      66/ Today was Barr's fifth presentation (summary) on the Report—and we still haven't seen it.

      30 replies 304 retweets 1,521 likes
      Show this thread
    10. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      67/ The question is, how did Mueller define "conspiracy" in Volume 1, pt. 3 of the Report? That's the part dealing with nongovernmental Russian nationals. Did Mueller consider any potential offenses involving Trumpworld and nongovernmental Russian nationals, or just "conspiracy"?

      12 replies 236 retweets 1,071 likes
      Show this thread
      Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

      68/ Did Mueller look at bribery, money laundering, RICO, illegal solicitation of foreign campaign donations, aiding and abetting, conspiracy to defraud the United States (which might well be seen *not* as a conspiracy "with" Russian nationals) or just one strand of "conspiracy"?

      7:03 AM - 18 Apr 2019
      • 331 Retweets
      • 1,331 Likes
      • Can't stand liars MAY J From Frederick Lynne Barrett Done_With_It_Already!! candidlyami DR Hoctor Lois Givens kay Exline
      21 replies 331 retweets 1,331 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          69/ Remember that "collusion" is *not* a legal term: but it *is* an umbrella term for a series of federal criminal statutes the violation of which would, in a speaking indictment, be undergirded by (broadly speaking) "collusive" conduct in the commonsensical sense of that word.

          60 replies 287 retweets 1,205 likes
          Show this thread
        3. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          70/ I believe what we will discover in two hours is: (a) all the counterintelligence information about whether Trump is compromised will be *erased* from the Mueller Report, and (b) the *only* conspiracies really discussed in the Report will be those that no one accused Trump of.

          35 replies 391 retweets 1,326 likes
          Show this thread
        4. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          71/ Barr trumpeted Trump's cooperation with investigators. *Wow*. He fought responding to questions for over a year—and when he did he'd only accept written questions on narrow topics with no follow-up. Not to mention he fired Comey, tried to fire Mueller twice, fired Sessions...

          30 replies 565 retweets 1,971 likes
          Show this thread
        5. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          72/ AG Barr also confirmed that the White House had early access to the Report, i.e. while it was preparing its counter-response. NBC has already called this "actual collusion." MSNBC (Melber) notes Barr said Mueller looked at ten events in the obstruction timeline in particular.

          20 replies 481 retweets 1,714 likes
          Show this thread
        6. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          73/ Trump is on a full PR *offensive* on Twitter. But even on Fox News, Chris Wallace is saying that Barr's press conference just now did not seem like a press conference by an Attorney General, but an advocate for the president. No one is buying this massive Trump/Barr PR blitz.

          74 replies 884 retweets 3,025 likes
          Show this thread
        7. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          74/ Katyal notes—rightly—that Barr praised Trump wherever possible but never noted that Trump was (among much else) proved *wrong* on who interfered with the '16 election and how serious the interference was. All those tweets about this being a "witch hunt" investigation? Wrong.

          17 replies 379 retweets 1,636 likes
          Show this thread
        8. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          75/ MSNBC notes, too, what I've been writing about here on Twitter for a year—we're talking about obstruction (was Trump "angry" when he obstructed? was he "frustrated" when he obstructed? was he in an "unprecedented" situation?) in a way we *never* would with an average citizen.

          30 replies 279 retweets 1,501 likes
          Show this thread
        9. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          76/ Any attorney listening to Barr heard euphemistic, careful language in his presentation. In other words, Barr was putting a gloss on the case in the way a defense lawyer would—but not even the way a lawyer would *in-court*, but the way an attorney might *outside a courthouse*.

          33 replies 442 retweets 1,846 likes
          Show this thread
        10. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          77/ Too few people are noting the following key (and overarching) fact: William Barr no longer has credibility, as the Attorney General, on *any* matters relating to Donald Trump. It is impossible to imagine any journalist crediting Barr on any Trump-related issue going forward.

          95 replies 929 retweets 2,792 likes
          Show this thread
        11. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          78/ Neal Katyal, who helped write the DOJ's Special Counsel regulations, notes that Barr offering up Mueller's testimony to Congress was—well—worth nothing at all, as Mueller will shortly be outside the authority of the DOJ and, really, Barr can't stop him from testifying anyway.

          17 replies 437 retweets 1,758 likes
          Show this thread
        12. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          79/ People misconstrue the problem with Barr using the term "collusion." It's not that it's not a legal term—though it's not—it's that it's a hard term to use accurately in this context—though you can—and it can easily be used as *political rhetoric*. And that's how Barr used it.

          17 replies 216 retweets 1,116 likes
          Show this thread
        13. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          Seth Abramson Retweeted Jonathan Swan

          80/ BREAKING:https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1118883809754263553 …

          Seth Abramson added,

          Jonathan SwanVerified account @jonathanvswan
          Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow just told me he first saw the Mueller report on Tuesday afternoon. Trump’s legal team, including the Raskins, made two visits to the Justice Department to view the report securely — late Tuesday and early Wednesday, Sekulow said.
          25 replies 455 retweets 1,361 likes
          Show this thread
        14. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          Seth Abramson Retweeted Adrienne Watson

          81/ Long ago, we were told by many media outlets that Rod Rosenstein was a "survivor." We were told that meant that he did what he had to do to survive professionally—that he was flexible. Well, here's what having no core principles looks like in practice:https://twitter.com/Adrienne_DNC/status/1118872403994607617 …

          Seth Abramson added,

          Adrienne WatsonVerified account @Adrienne_DNC
          Remember when Rosenstein wrote this in a letter so he could fire Comey? “We do not hold press con­fer­ences... about the sub­ject of a de­clined crim­inal in­vest­ig­a­tion.” - Rod Rosenstein
          45 replies 621 retweets 2,015 likes
          Show this thread
        15. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          82/ This will be the one time during this live thread I repeat something I've often said on my feed: never ever ask why men and women will throw away their good name for Trump—the GOP has made it clear they think Trump could tear the party in two and destroy it if they cross him.

          55 replies 473 retweets 1,828 likes
          Show this thread
        16. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          83/ The GOP has long been about winning elections despite being a minority party whose views most of America disagrees with. Since 1994, it's rarely been about principles—but rather, multifaceted voter suppression. So no, *nothing* is more important than keeping the party alive.

          38 replies 592 retweets 2,017 likes
          Show this thread
        17. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          84/ Per usual, @AshaRangappa_ gets it:pic.twitter.com/tdFsyA3mZq

          20 replies 696 retweets 2,208 likes
          Show this thread
        18. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          85/ I *do* differ from @AshaRangappa_ in distinguishing between *four* scenarios: (1) Collusion by conspiracy (a crime)* (2) Collusion by other crimes (a crime)* (3) Noncriminal collusion (a national security threat)* (4) Noncriminal collusion (an ethical offense) *Impeachable.

          22 replies 436 retweets 1,617 likes
          Show this thread
        19. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          86/ Barr's use of "collusion" *at most* referred to "Scenario 1 [of 4]"—collusion by criminal conspiracy. (I'd argue that he was only referring to conspiracy with certain people at certain times, however.) His *political trick* was to pretend he was referring to *all four types*.

          16 replies 257 retweets 1,082 likes
          Show this thread
        20. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          Seth Abramson Retweeted POLITICO

          87/ If you were, uh, *alive in America* from 2017 through the present, you know that "ten" is a *very* small number compared to the public behavior we saw from Trump and the private behavior we read about in major media:https://twitter.com/politico/status/1118890147020460033 …

          Seth Abramson added,

          POLITICOVerified account @politico
          Barr said Mueller examined 10 episodes that could have amounted to obstruction, but that he and Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein ultimately determined the facts did not amount to evidence of a crime https://politi.co/2Xlrfar 
          Show this thread
          12 replies 253 retweets 1,308 likes
          Show this thread
        21. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          88/ BREAKING: Papadopoulos Appears to Have Lied in Saying He Never Told an Australian Diplomat in April '16 About the Kremlin Having Stolen Clinton Emails (Intel Trump Adviser John Mashburn Says Papadopoulos Then Passed to the Campaign—Meaning, Trump Knew)https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/downer-papadopolous-trump-mueller-russia?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharetwitter …

          22 replies 632 retweets 1,775 likes
          Show this thread
        22. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          89/ Congress gets the redacted Mueller Report in two minutes.

          15 replies 113 retweets 895 likes
          Show this thread
        23. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          Seth Abramson Retweeted Brian Beutler

          90/ This is incorrect. We were waiting on *Mueller* to tell us if there was a provable criminal conspiracy in the collusion we know about, and *are* waiting on *20 other investigations* to tell us if there were *other* impeachable crimes in that collusion.https://twitter.com/brianbeutler/status/1118891268929617921 …

          Seth Abramson added,

          Brian BeutlerVerified account @brianbeutler
          This has been the whole shebang for nearly two years. We established collusion a long time ago. We were waiting on Mueller to tell us whether any of that collusive behavior amounted to a provable criminal conspiracy. https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/1118887069659664384 …
          12 replies 275 retweets 1,245 likes
          Show this thread
        24. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          91/ And the way Barr has framed the Mueller Report, it's *certain* we won't even get a *complete* answer on whether there was a criminal conspiracy in the collusion we know about—as Trump's collusion with Russia was part of a *multinational* conspiracy Mueller didn't investigate.

          17 replies 194 retweets 991 likes
          Show this thread
        25. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          92/ The reports we've had from the NYT, Washington Post, ProPublica, and others have established that Trump's collusion with Russia was part of a broader "grand bargain" involving at least 6 countries—yet we heard *none* of those countries but Russia named by Barr in his presser.

          25 replies 377 retweets 1,327 likes
          Show this thread
        26. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          93/ So in speaking carefully today, we must say that, *at most*, what we will learn in an hour is how much evidence there is that Trump or his circle engaged in *one* type of conspiracy with *one* type of co-conspirator (Russian government officials, and *perhaps* their cutouts).

          16 replies 157 retweets 879 likes
          Show this thread
        27. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          94/ MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: Mueller Report Released Link: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf … More coming very soon...

          21 replies 386 retweets 1,213 likes
          Show this thread
        28. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          95/ NOTE: I am only going to focus on *new* information in the Report that readers of this feed do not already know. More coming very soon...

          22 replies 129 retweets 922 likes
          Show this thread
        29. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          96/ The Executive Summary to the Conspiracy Section (Volume I) seems to suggest that Mueller believes the first report to U.S. intelligence about Russia came from the Australians in July, regarding Papadopoulos' May 2016 meeting with Downer (in an earlier typo, I said "April").

          12 replies 201 retweets 1,109 likes
          Show this thread
        30. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          97/ To be clear, though, I don't want to draw conclusions from the Executive Summary—especially as counterintelligence information from our Western allies may have been redacted. So let's proceed with caution, and simply put a pin in the Papadopoulos-Downer meeting in May 2016.

          15 replies 129 retweets 867 likes
          Show this thread
        31. Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 18 Apr 2019

          98/ "The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign." Barr didn't note *that*.

          15 replies 629 retweets 1,952 likes
          Show this thread
        32. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info