Women can’t even afford to be monogamous today. The opportunity cost is too great.
From an evolutionary standpoint or just a “variety of cock” standpoint? In terms of evolution, isn’t it still better to remain monogamous with the father once they’ve successfully given birth to a child?
-
-
From an economic standpoint. Why stay with one man who will provide you with a large chunk of his salary when you could take considerable chunks from many men. Sugar dating, alimony payments, child support, escorting. You miss out on all these, hence opportunity cost.
-
Checks out. Seems we should be grateful not every women thinks about relationships through a purely economic lens. Though that may be changing
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.