Such an approach would provide more continuity, elicit the most information & allow an in-depth examination of the allegations.
Show this thread
I'm writing to the Chairman & RM of Judiciary Cmte respectfully recommending that at Monday’s hearing, counsel for Prof. Ford be allocated time to question Judge Kavanaugh & counsel for the Judge be granted equal time to question Prof. Ford, followed by questions from Senators.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about questions from a psychologist or authority on sexual abuse?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Include Mark Judge. The man in the room at the time of the assault. Otherwise this is meaningless
-
Now a third witness has been named and like Mr. Judge he denied this happened.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are you going to ask
@ChuckGrassley why relevant testimony won't be heard. Mark Judge was there even is he's pretending not to have any memory of the event.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please ensure that Mark Judge is present & questioned & that experts on sexual assault are present with time to speak. The Senate Judiciary handled Anita Hill's testimony appallingly. It would be more appropriate to pause and allow a professional investigation by FBI
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is a fabricated assault on a decent family. These type of last minute allegations are baseless and should not be allowed!! Kavanaugh has a proven record of decency, sterling character and high ethics.
-
Apparently he doesn't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And Mike Judge, the alleged co-conspirator. Especially since he's already spoken up, he must be cross-examined as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.