You might want to read the 2nd Amendment again. Nowhere does it mention anything about self-defense.
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
It’s not tricky. Your touting of Indiana’s failed red flag law is the problem. This law didn’t work. Your continued support of this says you accept a certain number of mass killings to defend some absolute right for all sorts of weapons to be available.
-
Disarming the public is not going to prohibit mass killings. In fact, a leftist totalitarian power grab will likely result in the deaths of millions. A precursor to this would be seizing guns. It's not going to happen by the way. Gun owners won't yield.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
BTW, excellent screengrab of you - you are aware they did that on purpose, right? They literally had infinite options and that's the best they got.

-
That’s the most smartest intelligent looking picture I’ve ever seen of HIM.... they must really have a good photographer . They captured his true essence
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
(There's no second amendment right to self defense)
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
This is a bad take. Thousands of dead Americans isn’t “the price of freedom.”
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
There clearly need to be limits on weapons. We HAVE limits. You can’t have a personal F16 armed with bombs for example. It’s just a matter of where we set those limits. Clearly right now our limits are NOT working.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.