If legislators in Washington actually read this $19.1 billion spending bill, maybe they would share my concern with spending taxpayer funds on pet projects, like provisions for cherry farmers who make over $900,000 a year ... (2/3)
-
-
Show this thread
-
... instead of dealing with real problems like relief for victims of natural disasters or the humanitarian crisis on our southern border. (3/3)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s what happens when you give away the store to the already wealthy & corporations.
-
It’s not about spending (though trump has gone nuts) it’s about revenue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know where we can save $100 million.
#TraitorTrump#AgolfTwittlerhttps://trumpgolfcount.com/Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or paying down the deficit...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My family tried to keep a surplus so we can react to unexpected expenditures without cutting anything important. Both Democrats and Republicans have run deficits lately, which gives you less flexibility. It rained on Puerto Rico, and yesterday it rained on our neighbors in Ohio,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you think disaster assistance is a waste of money, why aren't you interested in fighting climate change?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In the private sector do you make stupid decisions that cost your customers more money and then throw even more money at the problem with handouts for those suppliers hurt by your bad business practices?!? Asking for a Hoosier Farmer friend
#TradeWar#GOPCorruptionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.