In his testimony last week, didn’t he blame the Dems for all this? And threatened “what goes around comes around”? Aren’t justices supposed to be impartial? Check Canon 3 about this in the SCOTUS rules.
Today I reviewed the FBI’s supplemental background investigation of Judge Kavanaugh. My statement:pic.twitter.com/H20Fcohi1j
-
New conversation
-
-
-
Truth be known, you probably didn’t even read it because you were a “NO” 2 seconds after he was nominated.
-
She read the memo Schumer gave them, so they can have the same talking points
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You won't have to worry come November and
@LeahVukmir wins your sentate seat.#thankGod#ConfirmKavanaughNow#MAGAThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are only two groups you stand with 100% of the time. The LBGT and Planned Parenthood. They both are against ANY constitutional conservative being appointed to the court. Stop acting like you are making a decision. Your masters have already told you how you're going to vote.
-
Senator Baldwin your masters at PPH are tweeting. In November the people of Wisconsin should vote for a Senator who will listen to them. Not the special interest groups.pic.twitter.com/AHPSb5MMMU
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you
@SenatorBaldwin this nominee is clearly not suitable for SCOTUS. His behavior and obvious bias at the hearing was atrocious. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Here, let me save you and your staff time. Just use the following for all future press releases. Sen. Baldwin, along with most US Senators, has no mind of her own. She, as with the majority of the US Senators, will vote with the party leaders. Term Limits.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.