Wow, this is so cool. Let me tell all my friends who had to leave California due to affordability that their fave buildings are here so they can fly right over.
Preserving our uniquely Californian structures, such as the craftsman, the California ranch, the mission revival & art deco buildings, stimulates local economies and safeguards our rich history. It’s a win-win! Thank you to my Senate colleagues for passing #SB451.pic.twitter.com/A1UbwBVqOM
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Giving tax breaks so rich homeowners can renovate their mass produced house from like the 20s?pic.twitter.com/64BfQcYTgw
-
"Ugh, these 'luxury' box apartments are so tacky and ruin the neighborhood character!" complained the NIMBY in Venice from inside his Sears mail order kit bungalow that now costs $2.5m. http://www.house-crazy.com/1923-sears-kit-home-for-sale-in-venice-ca/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can we use this money for rental assistance and eviction counsel instead?
-
At least now it will be even more difficult to convert historic-looking homes into fourplexes!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Preserving rural LARPing in the suburbs (and their ever increasing property values) is more your goal than housing for people. Your progression on this issue over the last few weeks has been interesting. It is clear you never has honest intentions to let SB50 get a vote.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because rich homeowners clearly need yet another tax break. Thank you for showing us your priorities.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cool dude! You're giving tax breaks to rich people who bought some old art while most young Californians I know will have no choice but to buy homes in some other state. Where's the future revenue for your bill going to come from? Call a vote for
#SB50!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Senator, please reconsider your priorities with regard to housing. We desperately need more housing built in California, both market-rate and affordable. Using state funds to reward wealthy homeowners for freezing their houses in amber is exactly what we should NOT be doing.
-
That's not what this does--it also facilitates conversion of non-residential buildings to residential, and includes additional incentives for affordable housing conversion using historic buildings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.