For months, the GOP has said that legislation to protect the special counsel is not needed because they’ve been assured by unnamed aides that the president won’t fire the Special Counsel. @realDonaldTrump himself has totally undermined that excuse.pic.twitter.com/TcNbjLCjTK
-
-
Almost a year and not one peice of evidence. Maybe if you believe so much that
@realDonaldTrump colluded with Putin then put your money where your mouth is. Alot of Americans are tired of paying for this.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
PASS THE BILL THAT PROTECTS MUELLER TONIGHT.
-
There is no bill. The pres would have to sign it. Do you understand ?
-
Just like the RU sanctions bill they could vote overwhelmingly to veto proof it. But just like the RU sanctions law which Trump signed and then sent a note to Congress that it's "unnecessary" And Congress didn't react to Trump's lawlessness this protect Mueller law could be same.
-
sadly, you are right. Congress prefers to turn a blind eye to trump's misdeeds
-
Misdeeds?? What misdeeds??
-
and then crickets - happens every time.
-
Funny that happens a lot.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, this was supposed to be about Russia. Not taxes or Facebook trolls or Access Hollywood. There was no collusion. You don't take the man then look for a crime. This will end.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why do you keep trying to sound relevant you ignorant f*ck? If this was Hussein Obama the Democrats would of stopped the with hunt a long time ago and if anybody said anything, they would of been labeled as "racist"! Shut you demonic pie hole!
-
there would have been no investigation of Obama in the first place! There still isnt! There should be one going on right now!
-
Oh I think there is ..
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Schumer, your playground tactics won't work on our President. He is light-years smarter than you. Deep State = YOU
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Respectfully, Senator, this administration has crossed MANY red lines already, and they are already a threat to our constitutional order. I have little faith that any of you will stop this.
-
Which red lines are you talking about? Explain them please? What lines has he crossed? What laws has he broken? PROOF remember....not just gossip you hear on the internet. Actual proof if Trump directly, HIMSELF, breaking the law or "crossing the red line". 2 year, NOTHIN on him!
-
Any proof that is offered will be shrugged off as "Fake News". If you don't see anything he's done as crossing a line ( you know like calling Nazis "very fine people", etc..) you never will, not even a flawless case from Mueller will sway you. Cheers to you and your koolaid.
-
So then you are believing something WITHOUT PROOF. THAT should tell you something.....because you certainly are not alone. Millions of people are forming their opinion of Trump based on gossip and lies. SIMPLE....BECAUSE THERE IS NO PROOF. Just a coup de tat. Google it
-
You’re right. You don’t need me to give you proof. Just GOOGLE IT! Have a great night!
-
Tweet unavailable
-
27% were behind Nixon all the way to his resignation. Some people won’t ever believe they were wrong. Of course now we have Fox. They’ve brainwashed so many.
-
My father-in-law, (91) who's glued to FOX Entertainment (News crossed out) still thinks Nixon was railroaded. But then again, he's always telling me how handsome Lou Dobbs is too. He believes they're a real news station & Hannity is just a very good commentator. No help for many.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.