dont fuck this up Chuck block him at all costs!
-
-
-
he should block a man
@SenSchumer voted yes to appellate court? How exactly does that work? I object to man I put on bench! -
tell that to all the Republicans who voted for Merrick Garland
-
you mean the GOP that followed the "Biden Rule"? And the 88 year precedent?
-
lol unrestricted power ain't such fun when you're the ones without it, is it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You voted for Gorsuch in 2006! You must be psyched your boy is headed to SCOTUS!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think that this pick will do what rightfully justpic.twitter.com/SMwg5b2lxL
-
Why has
@POTUS not uttered the name of#NavySeal#CPORyanOwens killed in#Yemen in#POTUS 1st ordered attack?pic.twitter.com/EdkjIKQj6E
-
You truly have no idea how stupid this comment made you look, do you. @POTUS is miles ahead of you. -
He had no intention of going. After 28000 requests he could no longer ignore

-
Right. EVERYTHING
@POTUS has done the last 10 days has been b/c screeching Leftists demanded it. smdh - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
they stole this seat. I and millions like me voted Obama in 2012 partly so he could fill this seat as per the constitution
-
In spite of an 88-year precedent of POTUS NOT nominating to SCOTUS during election year? Right.
-
The constitution is not different during election years. Putting party and elections over country is wrong
-
this is nothing more than sour grapes on yours and Schumer's part.
-
No there's principle at play
-
no there's really not. It is what it is and what it is is that Merrill wasn't chosen. Period.
-
ah "it is what it is," I think George Washington said that first. Very principled.
-
What's the principle involved? Picking up your marbles and refusing to play game because you lost?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.