Sorry Sen. Schumer, I usually agree with you, but settlement activity has to stop or there will never be peace.
-
-
-
Onve again I am proud of the administration for taking a bold stand for justice for all.
-
you can't take a bold stance by abstention
-
as long it affects the outcome then it's a bold stance.
-
no abstention is the act of taking no stance, look it up
-
as long as the sways an outcome then it is a contributory stance you look that up to.
-
Abstention is a way of allowing an outcome that you support to happen with fewer political repurcussions.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
We can love Israel without supporting unlimited expansion of settlements, which prevents a 2-state solution from being realized.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why? US Presidents since Nixon have condemned she settlements expansion.
-
but they've also vetoed UN resolutions similar to the one Obama abstained on today. So glad Obama is leaving office.
-
Reagan was against settlements. So was Bush Sr. So was Bush Jr.
-
Its not for America or any other country it is all Israel land.Thats the starting point, and bye to Hamas
-
the starting point is that international community, including the US, condemns the settlements.
-
International community cant make Israel do anything and President Trump will take care of the so-called UN
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
American Jews & more than half of Israelis disagree w u .You're my senator & I'm extremely disappointed in your hardline stance
-
Tweet unavailable
-
yes, polling suggests so!https://twitter.com/jstreetdotorg/status/812413891410067456 …
-
Tweet unavailable
-
so if you don't like what a poll says you just ignore it?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
they want it when it's called the ACA
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.