You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
My hearing examining irregularities in the 2020 election was important.
Many issues and questions were raised that deserve investigation and answers:
1) @RandPaul and Judge Starr talked about how courts really didn’t evaluate evidence of fraud at allpic.twitter.com/GogMphIFCg
2) And @senrobportman got Chris Krebs to acknowledge his claims about election security were about CYBER security, not fraud.pic.twitter.com/IGcGJkQSOH
That is correct!! He was under oath and said the election was secure, but not free from fraud.
Only it *was* free from fraud. None of Trump's court cases even focused on that, because they couldn't prove *any* actual evidence of fraud. Can you show me one (1) successful Trump court case so far claiming fraud?
Krebs testimony shows why he needed to be fired. A disgruntled employee. He claimed he oversaw the most security election in history while at the same time foreign influence was in every government computer system since March and he had no idea.
I do believe the Machines were set to let fraudulent ballots pass. Also he kept saying paper ballots prove the machine was accurate but the issue is the ballots themselves was fraudulent because they hacked the register voters log! It was also set up to let same ballots go in 2x
Keep in mind that this is the same Krebs who is responsible for the massive Solar Winds breach that occurred under his watch since at least 6 months ago. That incompetent is probably breathing a sigh of relief that he's been fired.
Judges wld not even look at the evidence and hear them out and I heard it was because some were being threatened! If a judge is being threatened by a regular citizen then they wld be in jail so this threat has to be from someone above them and powerful 
They looked at the evidence that was going to be presented, took it at face value, and found the case to be meritless. Trump doesn't use the same evidences in court than in public, because in court perjury is a crime......
RJ: your tone seems to indicate that Sen. Portman “caught” Krebs in a lie or misrepresentation. Chris Krebs was charged with maintaining electoral cyber-security, a task he, by all accounts, did flawlessly. WHY don’t you recognize and thank Mr. Krebs in your tweet? STOP IT!!!
"Guy in charge of cyber security mentions that he was in charge of cyber security" is hardly the gotcha Trumpists think it is.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
