In 2008, a gun shop owner was sued for allegedly selling a firearm to a fugitive off the books. The fugitive used this gun to kill a random bystander 2 days later. Despite repeated violations of federal gun laws, the seller was found to be immune from liability under PLCAA.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Bars can be liable for accidents when they negligently sell alcohol to people they have reason to think will drive drunk. But under PLCAA, gun makers and dealers can escape accountability for similarly negligent conduct. The gun industry does not deserve special privileges.
Show this thread -
Gun dealers who turn a blind eye to middle-men buying hundreds of weapons to sell on the streets use PLCAA to avoid legal liability. No one should be able to profit from gun deaths. Repeal PLCAA now.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Boom boom. Oh what fun. (I'm being factitious).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who are you aiming at? Gun manufacturer of retailers? Also how can a manufacture be held accountable if they only have to ensure the products works as designed?
-
Manufacturers could be held liable if they knowingly put an unsafe product out into the market, or if they participated in an illegal purchase.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.