As founder of @boostmobile one of the largest prepaid Brand's in the USA and a direct target of this merger, I would be pleased to be at this hearing to give my insight into why this merger is Bad for low income consumers.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are a lot more than 4 choices out there, Ed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_wireless_communications_service_providers …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WaltBTIG I'm not sure that 2 titans, a 3rd wannabe carrier that does marketing really well and a 4th carrier that probably can't remain solvent on their own is better than 3 strong players.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
So limiting choice in phones is bad because prices will rise and we don't " trust" business. But Gov limiting choices is always good. Huh.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The merger is needed to be competitive with ATT and VZ. There are bigger issues to address, including re-opening the government and paying your military.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nationalize them, before they merger in to one group.
-
like japans train system? fine
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Too many major buyouts create a system of too big to fail. The Bell split was to spark innovation. Wireless is limited in some ways due to its band and FCC regulations. But we need more options other than having 10 carriers selling the same network.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.