Pruitt isn’t crooked or resigning, quit your whimpering
-
-
-
So you're okay with him wasting your tax money the way he has? I thought conservatives were against government waste?
-
Depends on what you call waste. I say it’s waste to pay benefits to people to buy votes that don’t pay into the tax system
-
Don't know where you got that but ok. I thought a soundproof telephone booth and buying yourself rose bowl and Disneyland tickets was a waste, but sure
-
Haha... have to remember that. http://ag.ca.gov/cjsc/publications/misc/why/3sec3.pdf … This article talks about reasons of decreased enforcement and its effects
-
Personally I believe if you don't have a planet that supports life, it doesn't matter what profits you make, but that's just me
-
Haha, very true. But it’s my belief that climate control legislation is about people and policy control and people have actually little to do with CO2 emissions
-
Well even though it's been shown that humans have a direct effect on climate change, I guess this is an area we will just not agree on
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If all the corrupt politicians were run out of town, there wouldn’t be any politicians left.
-
Scott Pruitt isn't a politician.
-
Neither is the President, what’s your point?
-
Pruitt was hired to fill a government position. He has gone on a spending binge and seems to be beholden to various interests. He should be replaced. The matter shouldn't be political. Pruitt doesn't hold elected office. Political appointees are shitty sometimes. Flush the toilet
-
Couldn’t agree more.
-
Although I take exception to your use of the word “sometimes.” Should be “often” at a minimum. “Frequently” probably better choice.
-
It is what it is. Some jobs cannot possibly be elected... Defense secretary, FOMC members, Attorney General, and Treasury secretary come to mind first. They're supposed to be technocrats who can be fired for corruption or incompetence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
She actually posted a tweet today saying she agreed with decriminalizing it at the federal level.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Which Democrats didn’t sign? We need to know who finds this behavior acceptable.
-
Probably the same ones who take money from the companies influencing the EPA.
-
We need names.
-
You need a life....
-
Exactly why we need to get corruption out of EPA, hard to have life in toxic environment!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.