Trying to put a spin on the truth, Kamala? The truth is that you and the Dems are going to be exposed as the party who used classified information as a political tool, not the other way around.
-
-
-
You really have no clue how serious this is....Sen Harris isn't talking about Dems or Rep...she's talking about our overall national security for our

-
These people ILLEGALLY spied on American citizens based on unproven bought and paid for lies
-
It was legal ! As it's been said, they have 2go thru a special court & have good reason 2get approval 2do so. It's been said on all news.Our FBI protecting
It's all about Page=Trump=Russians. DJT has step N the way from beginning. He's only fired the investagtors& denies... -
Only the PROCEDURE....all the info presented to the Court was bogus.
-
No it wasn't but they would like you to believe that. Getting a fisa warrant is EXTREMELY difficult to do. Carter Page was on the FBI radar in 2013 WELL BEFORE trump ever ran for potus. If youre going to run w/ Russians youre probably on FBI radar. Try turning off fox & catch up
-
Well said!!!
#ImpeachTrumpNow -
Carter Page is an unwitting useful idiot for Russia and it would have been malpractice not to spy on that POS. Speaking of useful idiots, Fox News viewers need to switch the channel. By the way, when are those Russian Sanctions being put into effect?pic.twitter.com/zxRVFjNkpr
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would appear that the law is no longer being used when it comes to POTUS & his cult. He has operated in open lawlessness for a year & no one is holding him accountable. It's time for the PEOPLE to take things into our own hands. Be prepared to March in protest.
#Resistance -
Explain that open lawlessness in detail...with facts to support it
-
Dude, if you have to have it explained to you, you’ve obviously been relying on
#GOPpropaganda from FOX. -
Typical non-intelligent response from a misguided liberal
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You are all playing games. Don't stand on the side of hiding evidence from the public Senator. No matter how right you may be. If they have truthful information that changes public opinion its up to them and you to make the information safe for release.
-
The key word there is "truthful." The sources that have seen the memo say that it leaves so much out, the effect is to suggest untrue conclusions. That's lying by omission.
-
And that's how the Senator should be contesting this if that is the case. She is however saying because its classified it should be kept secret. That sounds like a coverup and is the wrong approach if what we have heard about all of this is accurate.
-
Classified information is usually classified in order to protect the lives of sources. Are you saying that Americans knowing this information is more important than the lives and safety of the people who gave it to our intelligence agencies?
-
If you read the memo (I did), it is clear that no lives were put in danger. But hey, keep regurgitating that tired talking point... smh
-
Funny, the democrats used to believe in truth and exposing corruption. Now they seem to be in protection mode.... from what??
-
The Republicans are systematically getting to fire the people investigating the president's wrongdoing, and you think the DEMOCRATS are in protection mode? We're protecting the people exposing corruption.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.