Assad’s use of chemical weapons against his own people was evil. However, President Trump has no legal basis for this strike. He does not have an authorization for the use of military force against Syria by Congress.
-
-
But regime change in Libya basically giving the Country to ISIS was okay with you?
-
Dems don't mention that little oops.
-
I'm unclear on what position Gillibrand occupies in the armed forces that she should be consulted on military strategy and tactics.
-
She reads her daily Media Matters email written by Clinton sycophants whose only goal is to
#Resist the rule of law -
And funded by Soros
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
With all due respect Senator, this one is ALL on you lot. Had Congress actually enforced the provisional constraints of the 1973 (see 50 U.S.C. § 1547d) WPR the first time it was used as a cover for such a strike, you wouldn't be making this Tweet. Do your job.
-
So NOW there is an opportunity to actually ENFORCE it. But no, what is likely going to happen is that ALL of you are going to do what you ALWAYS do: Talk about it. Until the next time it happens. And we're right back here. Again. ps: This is a GOOD reason to impeach that fool.
-
pps: You are probably aware that the WPR itself - which politicians passed - was already debated as being unconstitutional to begin with. But here we are.
-
There we go. IANAL, but he is.https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status/985211332487254017 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Were you just as disappointed when Obama did the same thing? Asking for a friend.
-
Obama still SUCK'S
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ms. Gillibrand, only an incompetent person would sit there & shoot off her mouth before she has all the facts - which are still being released. You don't support the decision, that even NATO has approved? Praise God you'll never be president.
-
NATO didn’t approve, only UK and France. Also, if we don’t have all the facts, why are we launching missiles?
-
No, it was on TV - NATO issued a statement approving of the strikes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are not privy to any of the discussions they had about strategy. Therefore you’re not qualified to pass judgment on them. Stop grandstanding & try to get behind America.
-
If she is not privy to at least the broad brush strokes, THAT IS A PROBLEM. She serves on the Senate Armed Services Cmte and the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, which have jurisdiction over a wide range of Dep of Defense policies and programs
-
Additionally I doubt she would be able to partake in any decision making process without political partisanship clouding her judgment. Even if Trump was 100% right about something she would dream up reasons to oppose him,this is why I can’t take her seriously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are just mad because you can't claim that
@realDonaldTrump is a puppet in Putin's pocket anymore....we see right through your DNC talking points. Schiff, Lieu, Kaine, and you, all tweeted the same thing almost word for word. Were the Congressional 8 notified 1st? - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.