@HillaryClinton @MichelleObama
1)I am too and I will be happy when women realize the "biggest roll back" for Womankind occurred on November
-
-
-
2)November 8th, 2016. This was when the Koch Brothers, the GOP, Trump and Russia STOLE THE ELECTION from
@HillaryClinton and INSTALLED a -
Tweet unavailable
-
4)in History. Women should be fucking furious and protesting to challenge the BOGUS RESULTS that gave Trump the Electoral College Win.
-
5)Love, like or hate Hillary, just remember; the great achievement for one Woman (like becoming POTUS) is an advanced for all Women!
-
6)When Women can put aside their petty judgement and misogynistic thinking we will be able to develop a genuine Sisterhood of Women.
-
7)Once this happens we will advanced forward by leaps and bounds!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can't this be somehow framed as a HIPAA violation? What are all these non-medical people doing in someone's private medical business anyway?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It has reduced abortions significantly. Ah, but conservatives don't really care about that, "pro life" is just a political cudgel for them.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
And when maternity care is not covered, then what?
-
We both know the answer to that. More guns! And if that doesn't clear things up, there is always for-profit prisons!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Try taking away their little blue pill. Even Medicare pays for that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't make religious organizations pay for it. There's a reason religious freedom is the first amendment. Pay for it with federal dollars
-
Religious organizations r already exempt and have been
-
I should have used better terminology. I also meant to include closely held businesses with owners that have religious convictions.
-
First BC then other medical conditions could follow. Bosses are not MD's they have no right saying what their workers need medically
-
plus it does not stop a person from their faith.
-
We shouldn't judge sincerity of someone else's faith or how they practice. They say it violates their faith. I believe them. 1/2
-
Question is what's more important in each scenario and must gov impose rules over a person's faith as only way to provide need 2/2
-
There are other remedies to provide BC that don't require us to violate someone's religion. Gov can just make it free for example.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.