Pre-emptive invocation of 5th amendment...
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed. But he won't be held in contempt. We all know it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indeed. But who is going to do anything about it?
-
The court system evaluates invocation of executive privilege. They decide if it is to be adhered to. They rarely do.
-
It was more a question of who will in THIS situation, rarther than how the system should function.
-
Kamala Harris could, any Senator who didn't get an answer. Burr could.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's absurd and insulting. "I won't answer in case later trump decides I should not have"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
like we deserved answers on Benghazi an email scandal an Clinton foundation guess what we never received answers works both ways senator
-
HRC testified for 11 hours. You are part of the problem.
-
The difference being Benghazi actually happened.
-
I remember when the GOP actually blamed terrorists for terrorist acts. Sad.
-
Right, YouTube videos are the way to go.
-
Give it up Comrade.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sessions states he remembers one meeting explicitly & then says he doesn't recall a point at that meeting?WHICH IS IT? This man is a lawyer?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Get 'em,
@SenGillibrand !!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.