The evidence was so "overwhelming" and "incontrovertible" enough for the House to vote in favor of impeachment. Why would they need even more evidence than that?
Senate Republicans continue to say that there's "nothing new" in terms of the evidence presented at this impeachment trial. Yet they voted down every amendment to enter new evidence into the proceedings. Sounds duplicitous to me.https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/gillibrand-gop-colleagues-are-being-duplicitious-on-evidence-77403717811 …
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Just as the Democrats in the House did to Republicans when they tried to introduce documents. and witnesses.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Pretty but no brain
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Right on, blonde sista!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Exactly, nothing new
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
And from the other side of the isle they are still calling the shakedown policy. https://twitter.com/marshablackburn/status/1220455281265729536?s=21 …https://twitter.com/MarshaBlackburn/status/1220455281265729536 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
-
“Sounds duplicitous to me” Senate Democratic Candidates for President shouldn’t be allowed to vote on
#ImpeachmentTrial since they have a conflict of interest.@ewarren@amyklobuchar@BernieSandersHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Now you're getting it beautiful.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.