No senator, it's histrionics and a false flag attack meant to create an emotional appeal where there is a complete lack of evidence.
-
-
-
Is it Gullibrand or Sillibrand
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let's face it, using the word 'hysteria' to describe women protesting is pure misogyny. In the 1800s they used to think that the womb caused women to behave illogically - hence our words hysterical and hysteria.
-
Look, there’s another one with the talking point of the day. I wonder if it’s just the same troll with about fifteen accounts.
-
And you’ll note that it’s not about my point that the root word of hysteria is the Latin word for womb. It’s about the larger issue of Kavanaugh getting confirmed. What’s in it for the trolls? Who benefits?
-
Who benefits if he's not confirmed? Let me tell you, the genocidal maniacs at PP benefits. Liberals who want so suppress speech, religion, gun rights win. democRATS who want to have a two class system of rulers & ruled win
-
I think I've figured it out - trolls just look for the most popular replies to Gillibrands' tweets, then post disinformation tweets. Which honestly is a waste of time. Who's going to be convinced by this? It's just the same garbage.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
60+ million babies
have died. And he (Jesus) said to them, “You are those who justify yourselves before men, but God knows your hearts. For what is exalted among men is an abomination in the sight of God.” —Luke 16:15Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are irresponsible in your inaccurate tweets. This is absurd and even you know it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
sexually, promiscuous, irresponsible women vs. unprotected unborn children .... mmmmm .... doesnt seem to be that hard of a choice to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if, one day, the Supreme Court overturned Roe, it would then return to the states to decide their laws on the matter. CA, NY, CT, MD and others would likely liberalize whilst more conservative state legislators would seek to tighten their state laws. That's all.
-
"That's all" is quite a trivialization if you are a poor woman living in for example Texas. Texas already ( & yes I know and am allowing for the counting error) already has a far worse maternal mortality rate than CA.Ending Roe would make that disparity far worse. Not minor, IMHO
-
Of, course, you have the right to your opinion. Thank you for sharing it without being belligerant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
promises, promises...you LOST...DEAL...Kavanaugh is IN, you guys are OUT!!!pic.twitter.com/tOCAseuXqm
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's not sexist to ask for proof of your allegation. What proof do you have that Kavanaugh will do anything you claim? Without proof, you are just fearmongering and justifying it by falsely labeling questions in order to silence opposition to your partisan desire.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I am so tired of this fight, but we can't back down.
#StopKavanaugh#VoteBlueToSaveAmerica
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And they die even now. Through medical bias and because pregnancy is so undersupported even now.
-
Actually, America has one of the highest deaths of mothers due to pregnancy complications, than 3rd world countries. That's a fact. Why would she be more concerned about killing babies, than saving mothers? Liberalism, that's why. It's a mental illness.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.