Actually weapons of war are protected under the 2nd Amendment. See Miller Vs. U.S. (1939). However the weapons you are describing are not weapons of war or assault weapons. They are commonly used for self defense and self defense weapons are also protected under the 2A.
Glad to see the Federal Court in Massachusetts uphold the state’s #AssualtWeaponsBan. Five courts of appeals have also upheld assault weapons bans. Weapons of war are not protected by the 2nd amendment and we must get them off our streets.http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/381957-federal-judge-upholds-massachusetts-assault-weapons-ban …
-
-
-
You’re preaching to the uneducated. It’s pointless.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
on one hand you tell us police cannot be trusted with guns
#blacklivesmatter
on the other only police should have guns #neveragain
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Weapons of war ARE protected by the 2nd Amendment—more so than handguns. (Which is better suited to militia use?) Can’t fix gun laws until we repeal the 2nd Amendment.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
From a constituent: Thanks for your leadership on public safety and your efforts to keep weapons of war off our streets, Senator.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.