Banning assault rifles is unrealistic. We should restrict ownership to police officers, military personnel and members of well regulated militias. Must take them away from anyone who is unqualified or a danger to the community.
Weapons like the AR-15 are designed to hunt people, not deer. They are designed to kill the greatest number of people in the shortest amount of time. We need to get these weapons of war off our streets. #BanAssaultWeapons
-
-
-
Why, exactly, is banning assault rifles "unrealistic"? Because NRA nuts will be upset?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Banning assault rifles and high velocity ammo doesn’t impact your right to self defense or the second amendment. Tommy that was just a knee jerk statement with the emphasis on the second word
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Those weapons are exactly what the second amendment calls for for your well regulated militia to fight enemies of foreign and domestic sources
-
They may not have taught this in all schools, but do you know the major reason young states wanted armed, citizen-soldiers (militia)? To round up escaped slaves and stomp down their rebellion. It's true! But don't trust me. Read up on it. Crazy stuff.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
As you will also notice this a well regulated State militia.. not a private militia or even a private citizen militia
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
THEY HAVE A PURPOSE IN WAR Not in our schools or concerts or ANY CIVILIAN HANDS NRA are NOT THE 2nd AMENDMENT they are Lobby for Death
#TheResistancepic.twitter.com/IIr9H1gKwg
-
Please name one military war that the AR-15 has been in. Go ahead. I'll wait.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.